- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Stop Babysitting Rules.
Go Agentic
Step Into the Future of
AI-Powered Cyber Security
Bridge the CAASM Gap
with Exposure Management
AI Security Masters E8:
Claude Mythos: New Era in Cyber Security
Call For Papers
Your Expertise. Our Stage
CheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
hello everyone, does anyone have experience with 200 mbit / s with active threat prevention and DNS response time?
whether gaia is basically able to handle pure dns traffic with active blades bpa 200mbit / s
Datasheet (Gen V throughout) says that should be no issue.
See: https://www.checkpoint.com/datasheets/6200-security-gateway-datasheet/
However, always a good idea to validate the precise configuration with your local Check Point SE.
What's the specific question?
Default settings typically aim to mitigate latency/timeouts per sk89340
whether gaia is basically able to handle pure dns traffic with active blades bpa 200mbit / s
Wouldn't the number of DNS requests per second with active anti-bot/DNS malware trap be more interesting than the pure bandwidth generated by the requests?
I would recommend taking the appliance / solution sizing up with your local office and SE for validation.
we just got poc hardware, 4000 appliance .. but before we start i thought i should ask if someone has experience whether cp can handle so much dns traffic in principle / has experience
4000 series appliances are old (2 generations behind), newer hardware is recommended.
Unfortunately I only have the traffic - but you can hear that there are very many
sorry sg6200 - confused it with past stuff
Datasheet (Gen V throughout) says that should be no issue.
See: https://www.checkpoint.com/datasheets/6200-security-gateway-datasheet/
However, always a good idea to validate the precise configuration with your local Check Point SE.
thanks a lot - the problem is nobody has experience here in our country with this special situation, but i just start the poc then we'll get smarter, thanks
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 34 | |
| 19 | |
| 10 | |
| 9 | |
| 9 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 |
Tue 02 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (AEST)
The Cloud Architect Series: Check Point WAF. The next generation of AI-Powered Protection - APACTue 02 Jun 2026 @ 06:00 PM (IDT)
Under the Hood | Check Point SASE: Identity Integration & Access Policy Design Best PracticesThu 04 Jun 2026 @ 02:00 PM (CEST)
Deep Dive Webinar: New CloudGuard GWLB Deployment Without NAT Gateways - EuropeTue 02 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (AEST)
The Cloud Architect Series: Check Point WAF. The next generation of AI-Powered Protection - APACTue 02 Jun 2026 @ 06:00 PM (IDT)
Under the Hood | Check Point SASE: Identity Integration & Access Policy Design Best PracticesThu 04 Jun 2026 @ 02:00 PM (CEST)
Deep Dive Webinar: New CloudGuard GWLB Deployment Without NAT Gateways - EuropeThu 04 Jun 2026 @ 07:00 PM (IDT)
Deep Dive Webinar: New CloudGuard GWLB Deployment Without NAT Gateways - AmericaThu 04 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E9: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 1/5 - AI Agent SecurityAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY