- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
AI Security Masters E7:
How CPR Broke ChatGPT's Isolation and What It Means for You
Call For Papers
Your Expertise. Our Stage
Good, Better, Best:
Prioritizing Defenses Against Credential Abuse
Ink Dragon: A Major Nation-State Campaign
Watch HereCheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
Hi guys,
specific traffic with a private ip as destination, is matching a rule with the "Internet" object in destination field. This traffic don't pass trough External/DMZ interfaces.
Do you have any ideas?
Thanks and best regards
Francesco
Version/JHF level?
What is the precise rule (screenshot helpful)?
What interfaces does the traffic pass through and how is the topology defined on the relevant interfaces?
Quoting from sk64543:
"Internet" means "include all traffic directed to External or DMZ according to gateway topology".
Internet object, unlike many people expect, do not represent all routable Internet addresses. Instead, it is a sum if all networks that GW does not have defined as internal.
Check your internal networks in question are defined in GW topology. If this is not the case, system is working as designed.
Hi,
Traffic is passing through interfaces defined as "This network" or internal.
So, this traffic should not match policies configured with Internet object in destination field.
Thanks
Francesco
We cannot establish that, since you did not post your GW topology. If you are 100% positive that is the case, raise a TAC support request.
Already said above, open a service request.
Yeah, give us some more info. For example if it is a private IP but in a peer VPN domain it will be considered external (Internet).
It's not a VPN traffic.
I attached screenshots in the previous reply.
Thanks and Best Regards
Francesco
Hi @FWNinja ,
according to log detail screen shot you matched on Rule 140 but you put screen shot of rule 142.
can you share rule 140?
Thanks,
Ilya
Hi,
the rule is the same. The customer added 2 rules before and the rule 140 become 142.
Thanks
Francesco
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 64 | |
| 23 | |
| 13 | |
| 12 | |
| 11 | |
| 9 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 |
Tue 21 Apr 2026 @ 05:00 PM (IDT)
AI Security Masters E7: How CPR Broke ChatGPT's Isolation and What It Means for YouTue 28 Apr 2026 @ 06:00 PM (IDT)
Under the Hood: Securing your GenAI-enabled Web Applications with Check Point WAFTue 21 Apr 2026 @ 05:00 PM (IDT)
AI Security Masters E7: How CPR Broke ChatGPT's Isolation and What It Means for YouTue 28 Apr 2026 @ 06:00 PM (IDT)
Under the Hood: Securing your GenAI-enabled Web Applications with Check Point WAFTue 12 May 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Cloud Firewall delivered as a serviceThu 30 Apr 2026 @ 03:00 PM (PDT)
Hillsboro, OR: Securing The AI Transformation and Exposure ManagementAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY