- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
What's New in R82.10?
Watch HereWhen the Agents Attack
A Live Look at Agentic Exposure Validation
AI Security Masters E8:
Claude Mythos: New Era in Cyber Security
CheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
The simple answer is yes on current supported models.
How depends on several factors as have started to be asked here already, but also if the FW are clustered and if VLANs / Trunks are being used and the switch setup etc.
Which hardware / appliance do you use ?
Hi.
2 boxes model Check Point 3200
Does not have VLAN AND TRUNK
And the switch is with 1G speed on the ports
Port-Channel between the two firewalls and siwtch.
The speed of the ports today is 1G, this way it would be possible to make a port channel and pass 2GB
I recall customer doing this before, just cant recall all the steps they had to do. Will see if I can find it, as they also had TAC case for this as well.
We do not know anything about the GW HW used - so NICs can not be suggested...
It shouldn't depend on the hardware. The Linux bonding driver can work with any ethernet interfaces visible to the system. If there is at least one unused interface, it should be possible to build a bond with it, move traffic from the current interface to the bond, then add the current interface to the bond to get two links. This will definitely involve an outage.
Older SMB boxes/firmwares are a notable exception hence the query I believe.
The simple answer is yes on current supported models.
How depends on several factors as have started to be asked here already, but also if the FW are clustered and if VLANs / Trunks are being used and the switch setup etc.
Hello
I would like to ask a question, currently the speed of the fw ports is 1GB, we are using two boxes. Would it be possible to have a port-cahnnel between the firewall and the SSwitch and switch to 2BG?
Why do you post in General, this surely is not a General question, but depends mainly on the GW HW used. As you did not mention which CP GWs you use with which NICs, this can not be answered at all..
Merged / moved the duplicate threads
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 66 | |
| 22 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 |
Thu 09 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
Schutz souveräner Workloads: Check Point & die AWS European Sovereign CloudThu 09 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Edge Protection SD-WAN & SASEThu 09 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Tips and Tricks 2026 #9 - What's New with Check Point Email SecurityFri 10 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (IDT)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 48: Nieuwe Check Point Workspace SecurityTue 14 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E11: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 3/5 - AI Workforce SecurityThu 30 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E12: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 4/5 - AI GatewayThu 09 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Tips and Tricks 2026 #9 - What's New with Check Point Email SecurityFri 10 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (IDT)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 48: Nieuwe Check Point Workspace SecurityTue 14 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E11: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 3/5 - AI Workforce SecurityThu 30 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E12: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 4/5 - AI GatewayThu 20 Aug 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E13: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Ent 5/5 - AI Research & Threat LandscapeAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY