- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Scaling Check Point Automation with Arodonata
7 October @ 5pm CET / 11am EDT
AI Security Masters
LGTM: Bypassing an LLM Build Gate
When Prompt Injection Fails
What's New in Check Point SASE
The State of Ransomware Q2 2026:
This Quarter's Trends, and Their Impact on Your Defenses
CheckMates Go:
Half is Not Enough
Hi all,
What I would be trying to achieve is to figure out which objects is edited for creating configuration sheet.
I prefer not to include default object list in it due to its large amount of information.
Objects other than service ones are checked manually, but when it comes to service objects, it takes me forever to finish checking, too many for my eyes.
I thought just diffing customer's service objects list with the default one would do, but SmartConsole allows me to export them as CSV only with basic config info like port number, and comments.
Its advanced settings such as "Match for Any" are not subject to print.
Are there any useful tips to list those advanced settings?
Also much appreciated for any empirical comments!
Saitoh
You might to try Management API, although you will need to run for each type separately.
For example:
mgmt_cli -r true show services-tcp details-level full --format json
https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/latest/APIs/#cli/show-services-tcp~v2%20
P.S.
I think of time in Last Modified as a sign of configured object, but somehow colleagues of mine will not be satisfied unless actual diff of those settings is done.
They do not trust the value in Last Modified...
You might to try Management API, although you will need to run for each type separately.
For example:
mgmt_cli -r true show services-tcp details-level full --format json
https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/latest/APIs/#cli/show-services-tcp~v2%20
And note that you can use jq to filter output for services which have been modified by a person like so:
[Expert@MyManagement]# mgmt_cli -f json -r true show services-tcp limit 500 details-level full | jq '.objects[]|select(."meta-info"."last-modifier" != "System")|.'
{
"uid": "...",
"name": "Active_Directory_TCP_123",
"type": "service-tcp",
"domain": {...},
"enable-tcp-resource": false,
"sync-connections-on-cluster": true,
"use-delayed-sync": false,
"delayed-sync-value": 30,
"port": "123",
"match-by-protocol-signature": false,
"override-default-settings": false,
"session-timeout": 3600,
"use-default-session-timeout": true,
"match-for-any": false,
"aggressive-aging": {
"enable": true,
"timeout": 0,
"use-default-timeout": true,
"default-timeout": 0
},
"keep-connections-open-after-policy-installation": false,
"comments": "black",
"color": "black",
"icon": "Services/TCPService",
"tags": [],
"meta-info": {
"lock": "unlocked",
"validation-state": "ok",
"last-modify-time": {...},
"last-modifier": "WEB_API",
"creation-time": {...},
"creator": "WEB_API"
},
"read-only": false,
"available-actions": {
"edit": "true",
"delete": "true",
"clone": "true"
}
}
...
A side note - when we upgraded to r81.20 we lost all history and most object/rule was tagged as System - with the date of the upgrade being the last modified date. We discovered it a couple of days after, preventing any rollback.
We had most objects modified back to the original date with some work done by Diamond from a backup, but not all.
Just keep it in mind if you are using this for something 'important' 🙂
/Henrik
Dear @Henrik_Noerr1,
Thanks for sharing your experience.
Your comments made me want to test if last_modified/modifier were updated or not when making changes, and
found out they were not surprisingly!
I therefore went for extracting all the details of objects in the appliance with customer's config and default one, diffing them just to be sure.
Your comments helped me a lot, much appreciated!
Saitoh
Dear @Bob_Zimmerman,
Thank you for sharing your knowledge!
I did not know of jq command. Having tried, I found it really useful.
It is always good to know something new 🙂
Saitoh
Dear @Tal_Paz-Fridman,
Thanks for your comment!
I followed your instruction and run mgmt_cli in the appliance with customer's config and default config.
Diffing each result gave me the objects they edited, which is what I would like to know.
I created the macro for this procedure. Much appreciated!
Saitoh
Thanks for letting us know.
Andy
What @Tal_Paz-Fridman gave is probably your best bet.
Andy
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 32 | |
| 9 | |
| 7 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 |
Thu 01 Oct 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point WAF | Preventing minus-zero-day attacksTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 12:00 PM (ACDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus APACTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus EMEAThu 01 Oct 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point WAF | Preventing minus-zero-day attacksTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 12:00 PM (ACDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus APACTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus EMEATue 06 Oct 2026 @ 02:00 PM (EDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus AMERAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY