- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Step Into the Future of
AI-Powered Cyber Security
What's New in R82.10?
Register HereWhen the Agents Attack
A Live Look at Agentic Exposure Validation
AI Security Masters E8:
Claude Mythos: New Era in Cyber Security
CheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
Hi there
First time BGP setup with checkpoint (r80.40)
I've got a new environment and trying to setup a Cisco VSS with multiple VRFs that terminate to 16000 checkpoint. So multiple internal BGP peers with same AS #, i have received the routes fine from each peer, but i want to share routes from Peer 1 with Peer 2 for my test setup before i reattempt in production. I was able to share the checkpoint connected networks, as well as static routes fine with combination of route redistribution / route map, but not the BGP routes from
Route redistribution allows to pick same FROM/TO AS# and add a filter, thought that might work but no luck.
How is the way to do this? I'm also stuggling on route distribution with WebUI vs route-map on CLI... when is the right scenario to use each?
Hi Shawn,
If you wish to keep this purely iBGP setup, you may consider setting up a route refelector. "GAIA Advanced routing" briefly covers this subject.
Keeping all things BGP this would be the correct BGP term. iBGP assumes all peers to be fully meshed.
Assume we have iBGP talkers A, B and C.
B will not tell A about C routes learned from C.
B will not tell C about A routes learned from A.
The reason for this is since iBGP is assumed to be full mesh then B assumes C and A have BGP sessions with each other. Route reflector is the correct term to overcome this.
Sounds pretty good right? BTW I have no idea how to configure that in Gaia so.. uh.. maybe what firewall1-gx said is how to do that? 😄
In GAIA it should be rather simple — if you want to make your CheckPoint a reflector:
set bgp internal peer ##.##.##.# peer-type reflector-client
thanks for the suggestions - I did try route reflector but had no luck with that but in fairness we didn't open a case with TAC for assistance as we got a lot of feedback that OSPF was the more common option and moved on to that.
Make sure cluster members have the same router-id. Seems like a common configuration issue. Once its set you can only change it by removing the ospf config.
That is one of the reasons to use cloning groups when using dynamic routing, so you don't configure things double and with mistakes.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 24 | |
| 8 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 |
Thu 18 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point WAF - The Next Generation of AI powered protectionTue 23 Jun 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point Cloud Firewall | Securing all of your clouds: Art of the possibleThu 25 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E10: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 2/5 - AI Red TeamingThu 02 Jul 2026 @ 06:00 PM (CST)
Revolucionando la Seguridad con IA Generativa: Prevención Inteligente en Tiempo RealThu 18 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point WAF - The Next Generation of AI powered protectionTue 23 Jun 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point Cloud Firewall | Securing all of your clouds: Art of the possibleThu 25 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E10: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 2/5 - AI Red TeamingTue 14 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E11: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 3/5 - AI Workforce SecurityThu 02 Jul 2026 @ 06:00 PM (CST)
Revolucionando la Seguridad con IA Generativa: Prevención Inteligente en Tiempo RealAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY