we have to use individual configuration for our ras vpn users. Using check point mobile vpn (windows) client.
We implemented our requirement with the procedure described in sk114882 and it works fine. Thus we have some ttm_groups defined on managment server and the corresponding ttm-configfiles on the gateways.
As long we have only user objects in the ttm_group everything is working as expected. When adding also usergroups , it will not work for users in that added (nested) group.
It looks like that users in a nested group not correctly enforced.
How can this behaviour changed, or does a ttm_group not work with nested groups?
Any help is highly appreciated!