- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
MVP 2026: Submissions
Are Now Open!
What's New in R82.10?
Watch NowOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
Hello everyone
I have an issue with Endpoint Server R77.30.03; this server has been updated in July from R77.30.01; and everything has worked fine until last day, when all the client went in disconnected state; after several hours of checks and restart (cpstop/cpstart and also reboot of the server) clients began to connect correctly to server (connected policy loaded); but today the issue happened again; I've notice within the logs these entries:
==> /opt/CPuepm-R77/logs/mod_jk.log <==
[Fri Oct 26 22:43:37.837 2018] [14420:4156471040] [error] ajp_get_reply::jk_ajp_common.c (2118): (all) Tomcat is down or refused connection. No response has been sent to the client (yet)
[Fri Oct 26 22:43:37.837 2018] [14420:4156471040] [error] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (2600): (all) sending request to tomcat failed (unrecoverable), (attempt=1)
These messages appear when working with SmartEndpoint; and every task I try to perform on SmartEndpoint fail with timeout error (Communication Timeout Error - A timeout error occurred during communication to the server).
I supposed that there's some issue with Tomcat that cause the error with SmartEndpoint and cause the disconnection of the clients.
What can I check?
I've noticed also that there are two different instances of PostgreSQL (postgresql and postgresql9.2) each instance listen on a different port, and netstat reports connection only for the PostgreSQL 9.2; just I've never noticed this before, is it a normal behaviour?
Please help ... Thanks everybody
Have you opened a TAC case on this by chance?
Yes I've open a service request; what I've noticed is that the Tomcat server used by the endpoint server, is listening on localhost on 4 ports (8005, 8009, 61616 and 8080), the port 8009, sometime doesn't reply or reply after a while.
That's definitely worthy of a TAC case.
Hi Simone,
Got any solution on this from TAC.?
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 8 | |
| 4 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
Tue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY