- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- CloudMates Products
- :
- Cloud Network Security
- :
- Discussion
- :
- Re: R80.40 Cluster on Hyper-V
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
R80.40 Cluster on Hyper-V
Has anyone see issues with the standby firewall communicating through active as it should when installedin Hyper-V. I have seen this in at least 3 different clusters so far. Traffic is seen leaving standby on sync interface, but never appears to never arrive at the active firewall.
Thanks,
Corey
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Corey,
Not aware of a Hyper-V specific behaviour myself but that doesn't mean there isn't something unique there.
Meanwhile take a look at sk169154 and see if it assists with your situation (may also require a CCP tweak in consultation with TAC).
Refer also: sk167453
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I think this is due to hyper-V rejecting forged transmits. For a work around running fw ctl set int fwha_cluster_hide_active_only 0 per sk169154 does send the traffic out of the ext interface instead of the sync and with a no NAT rule for the cluster members traffic from the secondary now works. How can this be set to survive a reboot, fwkern.conf file with fw ctl set int fwha_cluster_hide_active_only 0 does not apply this parameter upon a reboot.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Did you configure it like below or something else?
fwha_cluster_hide_active_only=0
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Something else, "fw ctl set -f int fwha_cluster_hide_active_only 0" used sk16202 as a reference. Just tried "fwha_cluster_hide_active_only=0" and that worked. Thank you!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
That would be my next step, just wanted to see if anyone else had experienced this behavior on hyper-v installations.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Understood, seems Gary is testing for you. 😉