- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Scaling Check Point Automation with Arodonata
7 October @ 5pm CET / 11am EDT
What's New in Check Point SASE
The State of Ransomware Q2 2026:
This Quarter's Trends, and Their Impact on Your Defenses
AI Security Masters
Implementing the AI Security Trifecta
CheckMates Go:
Half is Not Enough
Dear Checkmates,
i have the following environment and issue:
Existing SMS:R81.10 HFA Take 66
New Gateways 6200 Appliances: R81.10 Take 79
I am already managing one Cluster with this SMS and now i need to mange a second Cluster.
I have configured the new cluster object , and created a new policy package.
Then i try to install the policy and the installation stops at 50% without any error message.
Could this be the case because of the different HFA versions ?
Silly question:
Is it normal that the newly created Gateway and Cluster objects are appearing with error state
in Smart Console and should change to OK only after the policy installation?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Stephan
No, its definitely not normal new cluster would have that state. I had done this many times before and never an issue. And no, jumbo take makes no difference. I, at one point, had R81.10 sms on lowest take and cluster on latest available take and it still worked fine. Ok, few things I would confirm before hand, lets begin with basics:
-what is fw stat output when you run it on gateways?
-can you ping mtmt <=> gateways and other way around?
-does SIC work fine?
-what about topology? Can you get interfaces WITH and WITHOUT topology?
Andy
Hey Andy,
thanks for your reply.
I will do a " fw stat" first thing in the morning.
The SIC was ok and i was able to get the interfaces with topology.
I did not try it without topology .
So, you mean that the cluster and gateway objects should be in OK status ,even i did not yet install the policy!?
What i have seen is that "cphaprob status" says "HA module not installed"
Then i did a "cphastart" but then each node thinks it is the active node and as long as the
policy installation ( and with it the cluster configuration) does not work this state is not cleared, i think.
Thanks
Stephan
Ok, so, if you had NOT applied policy yet, they will have - sign most likely, I believe thats by default. See, cphaprob status, you can check it once policy works, BUT...before that, make sure clustering is enabled from cpconfig (look for option 6 or 7 I believe and make sure it says "disable cluster membership...")
Anyway, yea, check tomorrow and message me, we can do quick remote and fix it.
Have a good day!
Hey Andy,
very kind of you....i appreciate it!
I will go to the office now, and drop you a message how it goes.
Cheers
Stephan
Hey Andy,
i am still facing the same issue, after a new creation of the cluster object.
When i try to install the policy i can see that 2 installation tasks are running...see screenshot.
There is no progress with the policy installation.
It stops at 50%
Do you have an ideas?
Thanks
Stephan
@Stephan_Lache please look into sk170475 and let me know if it helps.
Hi _Val_,
thanks for your reply.
We have enough free disk space .
Thanks
Stephan
What time zone are you in? Im in EST (GMT -5), should be free I hope after 10.30 am or so if that works. I can message you directly.
Hey, I suggested SK from the start, did not I? And you said you have enough space 🙂 What is that then?
Hello.
Is there any way to "interrupt" the installation of policies, when it gets "stuck" at 50%?
Thanks for your comments.
SSH to the management server. Search the list of processes for the fw loader processes.
ps xaf|grep load
Kill the PID for the processes you find. It's not the most graceful method, but... it'll get the job done. After that, you need to fix whatever problem is causing it to fail part way through (management behind NAT? if so, follow sk102712 Procedure 2).
Is your management behind NAT? You may need to edit $FWDIR/conf/masters on the gateway (or use GUIDBedit to tell the gateway to not overwrite $FWDIR/conf/masters each time, then manually edit the file to instead define the NAT IP of your management).
Check sk10271 and sk146112.
I think you missed a digit in the first article, but yes, I recall those SKs, very valid point actually.
Andy
sk102712
And you checked it on the GW, correct? Also, is policy actually installed on the GW or not? You can see the installation timestamp via fw stat.
In any case, to fix it, please open a TAC call.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 22 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 |
Tue 15 Sep 2026 @ 12:00 PM (MDT)
Lone Tree, CO: Workspace Security and Exposure ManagementThu 17 Sep 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Cloud Firewall Architectures - AWS, Azure & GCPThu 17 Sep 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Unified Hybrid Mesh Management across AWS Firewalls, SASE and SD-WANThu 17 Sep 2026 @ 03:00 PM (EDT)
Americas Deep Dive: Troubleshooting 101 for Check Point FirewallsThu 17 Sep 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Cloud Firewall Architectures - AWS, Azure & GCPThu 17 Sep 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Unified Hybrid Mesh Management across AWS Firewalls, SASE and SD-WANThu 17 Sep 2026 @ 03:00 PM (EDT)
Americas Deep Dive: Troubleshooting 101 for Check Point FirewallsMon 28 Sep 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
La nouvelle réalité des attaques DDoS: autonomie, échelle et avenir de la défenseTue 15 Sep 2026 @ 12:00 PM (MDT)
Lone Tree, CO: Workspace Security and Exposure ManagementWed 23 Sep 2026 @ 06:00 PM (EDT)
Santo Domingo: Workspace Security and SASE Live: Protección Total del Usuario Email, Endpoint y SASEAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY