- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
CheckMates Fifth Birthday
Celebrate with Us!
days
hours
minutes
seconds
Join the CHECKMATES Everywhere Competition
Submit your picture to win!
Check Point Proactive support
Free trial available for 90 Days!
As YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY
Upgrade to our latest GA Jumbo
The 2022 MITRE Engenuity ATT&CK®
Evaluations Results Are In!
Now Available: SmartAwareness Security Training
Training Built to Educate and Engage
MITRE ATT&CK
Inside Check Point products!
CheckFlix!
All Videos In One Space
I have a R81.10 16200 cluster "at this moment" migrated from older cluster (R77.30)
I see in the logs:
Attack Information: IPS Bypass Disengaged
Attack Name: IPS Bypass
Resource Shortage: Resuming IPS inspection which was bypassed due to resources shortage - CPU utilization / Memory utilization are:
Memory Utilization Percent:0
CPU Utilization Percent: 0
My GW CPU usage is around 10%. I see sk172305 and this message is likely a fake or real message? It means I should disable ips bypass or ignore this message? Or open a case to fix it ...
As Val said you need to track down the source of the spike, probably an elephant flow which you can check with fw ctl multik print_heavy_conn.
When it comes to the IPS Bypass feature JUST SAY NO. I've been ripping on this feature for years in my books and classes, here is the latest iteration in my 2021 IPS/AV/ABOT video series:
Depending on actual amount of cores, 10% average utilization may mean 100% on one or several cores, while others are idle. That will trigger IPS bypass nonetheless.
Look into "cpview" history or check on "top", to see actual per core utilisation.
ips bypass stat
IPS Bypass Under Load: Enabled
Currently under load: No
Currently in bypass: No
CPU Usage thresholds: Low: 70, High: 90
Memory Usage thresholds: Low: 70, High: 90
This is only the current state. Look at the timestamps in the logs, start historical view of cpview and go about that mentioned time to see CPU situation.
Yes, sometimes. General I have a equal load on cores, but cores have changing in time load.
top - 10:15:28 up 1 day, 16:34, 2 users, load average: 8.01, 8.40, 7.96
Tasks: 957 total, 1 running, 956 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu0 : 0.0 us, 20.6 sy, 0.0 ni, 52.0 id, 0.0 wa, 2.9 hi, 24.5 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu1 : 0.0 us, 1.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 74.5 id, 0.0 wa, 2.9 hi, 21.6 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu2 : 8.7 us, 5.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 85.4 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu3 : 9.6 us, 6.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 82.7 id, 0.0 wa, 1.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu4 : 12.9 us, 8.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 78.2 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu5 : 15.5 us, 8.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 74.8 id, 0.0 wa, 1.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu6 : 7.9 us, 7.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 83.2 id, 0.0 wa, 1.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu7 : 0.0 us, 0.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 87.1 id, 0.0 wa, 1.0 hi, 11.9 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu8 : 9.6 us, 6.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 83.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu9 : 8.8 us, 8.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 82.4 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu10 : 11.7 us, 11.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 75.7 id, 0.0 wa, 1.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu11 : 6.9 us, 6.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 86.3 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu12 : 8.7 us, 7.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 82.7 id, 0.0 wa, 1.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu13 : 0.0 us, 1.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 65.7 id, 0.0 wa, 2.9 hi, 30.4 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu14 : 8.7 us, 8.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 80.8 id, 0.0 wa, 1.0 hi, 1.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu15 : 0.0 us, 0.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 78.0 id, 0.0 wa, 2.0 hi, 20.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu16 : 9.0 us, 8.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 83.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu17 : 10.6 us, 9.6 sy, 0.0 ni, 78.8 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 1.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu18 : 18.1 us, 12.4 sy, 0.0 ni, 69.5 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu19 : 7.8 us, 8.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 83.5 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu20 : 8.7 us, 7.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 83.5 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu21 : 12.0 us, 7.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 81.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu22 : 10.9 us, 9.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 79.2 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu23 : 7.0 us, 11.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 82.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu24 : 0.0 us, 0.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 82.0 id, 0.0 wa, 2.0 hi, 16.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu25 : 0.0 us, 1.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 79.2 id, 0.0 wa, 2.0 hi, 17.8 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu26 : 8.7 us, 4.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 86.4 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu27 : 7.0 us, 8.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 85.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu28 : 5.0 us, 5.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 89.1 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu29 : 12.6 us, 7.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 79.6 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu30 : 7.8 us, 6.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 85.3 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu31 : 1.0 us, 1.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 85.6 id, 0.0 wa, 1.9 hi, 10.6 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu32 : 8.7 us, 6.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 84.5 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu33 : 5.9 us, 4.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 89.1 id, 0.0 wa, 1.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu34 : 11.0 us, 9.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 80.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu35 : 5.9 us, 5.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 89.1 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu36 : 12.6 us, 5.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 80.6 id, 0.0 wa, 1.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu37 : 0.0 us, 1.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 83.3 id, 0.0 wa, 2.0 hi, 13.7 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu38 : 25.7 us, 10.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 62.4 id, 0.0 wa, 1.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu39 : 1.0 us, 1.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 75.7 id, 0.0 wa, 3.9 hi, 18.4 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu40 : 10.8 us, 5.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 83.3 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu41 : 9.9 us, 16.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 73.3 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu42 : 11.5 us, 10.6 sy, 0.0 ni, 76.9 id, 0.0 wa, 1.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu43 : 7.0 us, 7.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 86.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu44 : 12.6 us, 7.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 79.6 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu45 : 7.9 us, 6.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 85.1 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu46 : 30.1 us, 19.4 sy, 0.0 ni, 50.5 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu47 : 1.0 us, 1.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 98.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
...
[11Jan2022 12:25:15] HISTORY. Use [-],[+] to change timestamp |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Overview SysInfo Network CPU I/O Software-blades Hardware-Health Advanced |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Overview Top-Protocols Top-Connections Spikes |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Host |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Overview: |
| |
| CPU type CPUs Avg utilization |
| - - - |
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| CPU: |
| |
| CPU Type User System Idle I/O wait Interrupts |
| 0 CoreXL_SND 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,715 |
| 1 CoreXL_SND 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,685 |
| 2 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,684 |
| 3 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,673 |
| 4 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,658 |
| 5 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,603 |
| 6 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,588 |
| 7 CoreXL_FW 0% 9% 91% 0% 2,497 |
| 8 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,457 |
| 9 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,399 |
| 10 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,391 |
| 11 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,425 |
| 12 BOTH 9% 0% 91% 0% 2,371 |
| 13 BOTH 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,408 |
| 14 CoreXL_FW 9% 0% 91% 0% 2,407 |
| 15 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,451 |
| 16 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,466 |
| 17 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,447 |
| 18 CoreXL_FW 0% 100% 0% 0% 2,425 |
| 19 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,452 |
| 20 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,462 |
| 21 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,474 |
| 22 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,456 |
| 23 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,474 |
| 24 CoreXL_SND 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,493 |
| 25 CoreXL_SND 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,465 |
| 26 CoreXL_FW 9% 27% 64% 0% 2,464 |
| 27 CoreXL_FW 0% 9% 91% 0% 2,437 |
| 28 CoreXL_FW 9% 18% 73% 0% 2,396 |
| 29 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,441 |
| 30 CoreXL_FW 0% 0% 100% 0% 2,452 |
|- More info available by scrolling down --------------------------------------------
tail /var/log/messages:
...
Jan 17 10:06:58 2022 fw1 spike_detective: spike info: type: cpu, cpu core: 4, top consumer: fwk0_38, start time: 17/01/22 10:06:09, spike duration (sec): 48, initial cpu usage: 82, average cpu usage: 71, perf taken: 1
Jan 17 10:08:21 2022 fw1 spike_detective: spike info: type: cpu, cpu core: 0, top consumer: system interrupts, start time: 17/01/22 10:03:23, spike duration (sec): 297, initial cpu usage: 92, average cpu usage: 62, perf taken: 1
...
Exactly that:
| 18 CoreXL_FW 0% 100% 0% 0% 2,425 |
That was the trigger.
In the /var/log/spike_detective/spike_detective.log I see roughly "a page" of spikes from today. So the conclusion is "disable ips bypass"?
By the way, I have problem with monitoring, but it looks unrelated to the IPS problems.
Based on this picture I have no communication over 16s periods. It looks I have a very, very tolerant users ;-). What may be the cause of such presentation?
Sorry, I have a hard time to understand what you are trying to say. Where do you see traffic outage? If you
IPS bypass kicks in when one or several CPUs are other threshold, to protect your production traffic and to make sure it still flows even if one of FWKs is very busy.
If you disable IPS bypass mechanism, it will only decrease performance during peak time. The proper way of action here is to get the root cause of the spikes and try to work it around.
If Accepted Packet Rate == 0 or Bytes Throughput == 0 then No traffic passing (on the screen - gray and blue lines). On the new console traffic flows. Monitored by snmp is OK. On Smart View Monitor - Carcassonne.
Spikes on big files are normal, because of most of the security inspections are single-threaded per single file, I think. And CPU is to work, not to be left idle - specially if you have 60 cores. So TH is right fighting it,but every vendor has it - connectivity over security.
So the final answer is "yes, disable bypass" - ips bypass off - fast fix, disable on cluster - permanent.
As Val said you need to track down the source of the spike, probably an elephant flow which you can check with fw ctl multik print_heavy_conn.
When it comes to the IPS Bypass feature JUST SAY NO. I've been ripping on this feature for years in my books and classes, here is the latest iteration in my 2021 IPS/AV/ABOT video series:
Thank you very much for this comprehensive answer!
About CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY