- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Scaling Check Point Automation with Arodonata
7 October @ 5pm CET / 11am EDT
AI Security Masters
LGTM: Bypassing an LLM Build Gate
When Prompt Injection Fails
What's New in Check Point SASE
The State of Ransomware Q2 2026:
This Quarter's Trends, and Their Impact on Your Defenses
CheckMates Go:
Half is Not Enough
Hi,
The launch of the new devices is behind us (2500). They will debut on R82.. The question is whether older devices (e.g., from the Spark Pro series) will also receive the same functionalities?
The EA for this release covered: 15x5/1600/1800/1900/2000 which of course is subject to change.
Please contact your local office if you require an official statement.
My understanding is that the R82+ code is incompatible with the older SMB appliances. Mind, this is not an official answer.
The EA for this release covered: 15x5/1600/1800/1900/2000 which of course is subject to change.
Please contact your local office if you require an official statement.
Correct.
R82 will be supported on 15x5/1600/1800/1900/2000.
R82 will probably not be supported on non pro appliances (15x0) - which will be continue to be supported via the R81.10.xx branch.
Will this be an normal upgrade or will the devices have to be USB flashed?
Afaik there has never been a new firmware that needed USB reimaging - you can do it both ways:
- WebGUI or CLI installation will keep the backup image of the former version and upgrade the active image
- USB reimage will overwrite the backup with the newest version and upgrade the active image
If the flash space is sufficient yes
Never had any space issue with SMB flash.
Fact is: The difference between 15x0 and 15x5 SMBs is that 15x5 have doubled RAM size - this can be a good reason for not supporting R82...
I think the processor is also somewhat faster as well in the 15x5 appliances, but RAM is the main reason the 15x0 appliances will not support R82.
hmm... I always thought the processor was the same as 15x0 and only RAM was doubled 🤔
It is the same according to the information i could find, see https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SMB-Gateways-Spark/History-of-SMB-Specs-and-Performance/m-p/1740...
It is the same actually
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
Thu 01 Oct 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point WAF | Preventing minus-zero-day attacksTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 12:00 PM (ACDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus APACTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus EMEAThu 01 Oct 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point WAF | Preventing minus-zero-day attacksTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 12:00 PM (ACDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus APACTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus EMEATue 06 Oct 2026 @ 02:00 PM (EDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus AMERAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY