Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
HerbertP
Explorer

R82.00.10 Remote Access using Cert seems broken

Hello,

after following the issues with R82.00.10 for a while, I have now tried to upgrade one locally managed appliance 1535 to 

R82.00.10.

Now clients using remote acess with certificate based auth can no longer reach internal hosts via vpn.

Windows and IOS Client (cert based auth is the only working way to use vpn on demand and split tunneling  on IOS) can connect, the office mode address is assigned and routing seems to be correctly set on the client, but traffic does not reach internal sites.

When the client is connected, the UI VPN/Connected remote users does not show that the users are connected.

Is this an know issue, is there a solution, as this completly breaks functionality.

Thanks

0 Kudos
4 Replies
Chris_Atkinson
MVP Platinum CHKP MVP Platinum CHKP
MVP Platinum CHKP

Suggest this will need an SR with TAC if not already?

Please also confirm the build of R82.00.10 image used and the applicable Endpoint client version/s?

CCSM R77/R80/ELITE
0 Kudos
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

What build of R82.00.10 did you load?
There's a known issue with certificate validation in some releases: https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk184766
My understanding is that build 998002133 (currently linked in the R82.00.10 SK) should contain the CRL fix. 

0 Kudos
HerbertP
Explorer

The build 998002133 is exactly the version I have loaded. This seems to be an issue, where after successful auth. the traffic on the smb device is not linked to the user that has been authenticated. 
When the clients are connected and authenticated, I can see traffic drops originating from the clients office mode ip. When I add a rule src:<dynamic-office-mode-ip> the traffic passes instead of being matched via the remote access rule (user, not group) that worked in previous versions.

Additionally the gw ui does not show the connected user as authenticated.

To me this is bug on the gw-side.

 

0 Kudos
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

You wouldn't be getting this far if the CRL bug were involved.
Suggest a TAC case here.

0 Kudos

Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.

Upcoming Events

    CheckMates Events