Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Phillip-83
Participant
Jump to solution

High Availability (HA) on Checkpoint 1590 Quantum Spark

Hi everyone,

I'm new to Checkpoint and I've been trying to learn how to set up for my customer.
Currently, I'm stuck in this place (Connection diagram as shown in the attached picture). I have configured HA for LAN on Lan3, synchronizing the firewall via Lan2. I don't HA the 2 WAN inputs of the 2 Checkpoints, but let them connect directly to the IPS via Metro (my customer using Metro Wan-MPLS Layer 2). Now if I drop the channel on FW1's WAN, will FW2 automatically switch from Standby to Active?

Can someone help me with the answer to this, please.

0 Kudos
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

Actually, there's an SK that covers this exact scenario and the steps needed to achieve it: https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk181841 

View solution in original post

(1)
6 Replies
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

To the best of my knowledge, only interfaces that are involved in clustering can cause a failover.
Doesn't sound like the WAN is involved in clustering, which means I would expect this to not work.
However, you might want to open a TAC case and confirm: https://help.checkpoint.com 

0 Kudos
Phillip-83
Participant

So if I have 2 transmission channels, with this checkpoint 1590 (There is no Router and SW WAN above the FW), is there any plan to HA those 2 transmission channels? These two transmission channels use 2 different IP layers from 2 different network providers.

0 Kudos
G_W_Albrecht
Legend Legend
Legend

Find all details for how to configure a SMB HA Cluster here: sk121096: How to configure a cluster between locally managed SMB appliances

CCSP - CCSE / CCTE / CTPS / CCME / CCSM Elite / SMB Specialist
0 Kudos
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

ClusterXL (on non-SMB appliances) definitely has a requirement for the WAN interfaces being on a "shared" network.
That said, clustering is a little different on the SMB appliances, which is one of the reasons I suggested checking with TAC.
I will also check internally as well.

0 Kudos
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

Actually, there's an SK that covers this exact scenario and the steps needed to achieve it: https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk181841 

(1)
Chris_Atkinson
Employee Employee
Employee

Is this locally or centrally managed, running R81.10.10 firmware?

 

 

CCSM R77/R80/ELITE
0 Kudos

Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.

Upcoming Events

    CheckMates Events