- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Scaling Check Point Automation with Arodonata
7 October @ 5pm CET / 11am EDT
What's New in Check Point SASE
The State of Ransomware Q2 2026:
This Quarter's Trends, and Their Impact on Your Defenses
AI Security Masters
Implementing the AI Security Trifecta
CheckMates Go:
Half is Not Enough
is my subject statement actually correct and validated?
my customer is having following message by Upgrade Wizard:
"No upgrade path available for this selection, for valid upgrade paths, click here" ...
Just ran the upgrade wizard
New Installation makes comment about 8Gb required but doesn't say incompatible.
What is the starting point
Even if start at SecurePlatform and Gaia R80.40 as endpoint then says need to do an R80.30 intermediate.
Maybe updated since your customer ran however certainly not seeing what you have had reported to you.
Would run it yourself and see what you get, certainly get the customer to run again but I certainly wouldn't say that your statement is correct based on what seeing.
Release notes are quite clear:
Appliances:
GW with 4 GB RAM is supported, but Stand-Alone needs at least 8 GB.
SMS with 4 GB RAM is supported as SMS only, SMS and Log Server need 8 GB, SMS, Smart Event and Log Server need 16 GB.
Open Servers:
R80.40 for Open Servers is supported only for Security Management Servers and needs & GB RAM. GW and StandAlone for Open Servers will need a Jumbo HFA.
So have they downloaded the Package and using the Verifier in CPUSE or simply running the upgrade wizard on the Check Point website.
If downloaded the package have they the latest Deployment Agent.
So that is running the Management Migration Tool which simply checks that can export the policy, not what can import into
Not the same as running the Upgrade Wizard.
How exactly is the end user getting the error message?
That is what presumed orgionally was running. With that then could when specifying Standalone and 4800 could even show as far back as SecurePlatform R75.47 to Gaia R80.40 and simply provided intermediate R80.30 was needed.
That tool shows no problems other then warning about 8Gb which they have already.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 20 | |
| 19 | |
| 19 | |
| 12 | |
| 8 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 |
Mon 28 Sep 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
La nouvelle réalité des attaques DDoS: autonomie, échelle et avenir de la défenseThu 01 Oct 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point WAF | Preventing minus-zero-day attacksMon 28 Sep 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
La nouvelle réalité des attaques DDoS: autonomie, échelle et avenir de la défenseThu 01 Oct 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point WAF | Preventing minus-zero-day attacksAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY