- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Scaling Check Point Automation with Arodonata
7 October @ 5pm CET / 11am EDT
AI Security Masters
LGTM: Bypassing an LLM Build Gate
When Prompt Injection Fails
What's New in Check Point SASE
The State of Ransomware Q2 2026:
This Quarter's Trends, and Their Impact on Your Defenses
CheckMates Go:
Half is Not Enough
hello everyone, does anyone have experience with 200 mbit / s with active threat prevention and DNS response time?
whether gaia is basically able to handle pure dns traffic with active blades bpa 200mbit / s
Datasheet (Gen V throughout) says that should be no issue.
See: https://www.checkpoint.com/datasheets/6200-security-gateway-datasheet/
However, always a good idea to validate the precise configuration with your local Check Point SE.
What's the specific question?
Default settings typically aim to mitigate latency/timeouts per sk89340
whether gaia is basically able to handle pure dns traffic with active blades bpa 200mbit / s
Wouldn't the number of DNS requests per second with active anti-bot/DNS malware trap be more interesting than the pure bandwidth generated by the requests?
I would recommend taking the appliance / solution sizing up with your local office and SE for validation.
we just got poc hardware, 4000 appliance .. but before we start i thought i should ask if someone has experience whether cp can handle so much dns traffic in principle / has experience
4000 series appliances are old (2 generations behind), newer hardware is recommended.
Unfortunately I only have the traffic - but you can hear that there are very many
sorry sg6200 - confused it with past stuff
Datasheet (Gen V throughout) says that should be no issue.
See: https://www.checkpoint.com/datasheets/6200-security-gateway-datasheet/
However, always a good idea to validate the precise configuration with your local Check Point SE.
thanks a lot - the problem is nobody has experience here in our country with this special situation, but i just start the poc then we'll get smarter, thanks
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 29 | |
| 9 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 |
Tue 06 Oct 2026 @ 12:00 PM (ACDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus APACTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus EMEATue 06 Oct 2026 @ 02:00 PM (EDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus AMERTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 12:00 PM (ACDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus APACTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus EMEATue 06 Oct 2026 @ 02:00 PM (EDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus AMERThu 08 Oct 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Under the Hood: Check Point SASE | Zero Trust Network Access, Step by StepAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY