- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Scaling Check Point Automation with Arodonata
7 October @ 5pm CET / 11am EDT
AI Security Masters
LGTM: Bypassing an LLM Build Gate
When Prompt Injection Fails
What's New in Check Point SASE
The State of Ransomware Q2 2026:
This Quarter's Trends, and Their Impact on Your Defenses
CheckMates Go:
Half is Not Enough
Hi there,
we have configured Remote Access VPN Client to disable the "always_connect" setting.
With the VPN Configuration Utility I integrate the trac.defaults file and thus create a new MSI installation file.
When importing the .msi file I get a "signature error" which I can skip, but at the latest during deployment I get a verification error.
When upgrading the client from E80.20 to E80.25, the trac.defaults file is overwritten and thus our "always_connect" (false) setting is lost.
Therefore I am forced to upload my own MSI file with integrated trac.defaults.
Is there a way to disable signature verification?
Or is there another way to include a separate trac.defaults file with an upgrade?
Or is there a possibility that the trac.defaults file will not be overwritten during a client upgrade.
Thanks.
Not as far as I know.
I recommend a TAC case.
What version/JHF of management are we talking about?
R81.10 (81.10.9600.402)
Did you apply sk172567?
If that didn't work, it might be worth a TAC case.
Updated the Console to R81.10 (81.10.9600.404) same error message appears.
I will set up a fresh win 10 and install the console. I will report.
2 different Win 10 installations with the same problem.
Is there a possibility that the VPN Configuration Utility destroys the signature when creating the MSI file? According to the SK article, should the utility also work for Endpoint Security Client?
Not as far as I know.
I recommend a TAC case.
OK. i opened a TAC case.
And what was the solution ?
Case ist still pending by checkpoint. I'll report as soon as I have more information
Reply from the TAC Support.
Customer: Hi there,
thanks for the enlightenment.
So that I understand correctly: Upgrading the client via the SmartEndpoint Console is only possible if the MSI file is downloaded directly from the Checkpoint server.
As I understand it correctly, the trac.defaults file is automatically overwritten when the client is upgraded. This is works as designed and cannot be prevented.
TAC Support: This is correct.
Regarding this statement: "As soon as the MSI file is changed/created, the client must be upgraded via SCCM/GPO." ---> Technically yes, we can dispatch this file to hosts separately but for large businesses SCCM/GPO are probably the most convenient and recommended.
As soon as the MSI file is changed/created, the client must be upgraded via SCCM/GPO.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 53 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
Tue 06 Oct 2026 @ 12:00 PM (ACDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus APACTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus EMEATue 06 Oct 2026 @ 02:00 PM (EDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus AMERTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 12:00 PM (ACDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus APACTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus EMEATue 06 Oct 2026 @ 02:00 PM (EDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus AMERThu 08 Oct 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Under the Hood: Check Point SASE | Zero Trust Network Access, Step by StepAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY