- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
What's New in R82.10?
Watch HereWhen the Agents Attack
A Live Look at Agentic Exposure Validation
AI Security Masters E8:
Claude Mythos: New Era in Cyber Security
CheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
Let's say we have to publish multile access rules to the Checkpoint that have the same source AND destination, but different ports. Is there a REST API that we could use to send a 'group' publish to the Checkpoint? So essentially, today with multiple individual publishes, we would see multiple individual rules published/installed on the Checkpoint, each with a single port number. If the group publish/install feature is avaiable, we should only see one rule, that is for all requested different ports. Same source and destination, but for multiple ports, that is.
Thanks.
That's also in the return section. Go to the top of the page, and collapse the sections as you go down. An expanded section has a white V in a gray circle, and a collapsed section has a white > in a gray circle. Click on the gray circle to toggle. Once you have everything collapsed, expand the Arguments section. The "service" key accepts string or List: string. Both forms want the string to be either a name or a UUID of an appropriate object.
'service-ranges' isn't used for any configuration. It's only present in returned objects if you include "show-as-ranges":true in your call's body. I just confirmed /add-access-rule doesn't actually accept the show-as-ranges key in the body, so the service-ranges key in the documentation for the return is a documentation bug.
To be sure I understand, it sounds like you're saying you add one rule per service, then publish, and you want the publish to look like it's a single rule instead of two or more. Publishing shows the changes made accurately. If you add multiple rules, it will always show multiple rules added.
Why not just add a single rule with multiple services? Via HTTP, you simply stick an array of service object names or UUIDs into the "service" key. Via mgmt_cli, you have to deal with how mgmt_cli represents arrays and do "service.1 <name or UUID> service.2 <name or UUID> service.3 <name or UUID> ...".
That's also in the return section. Go to the top of the page, and collapse the sections as you go down. An expanded section has a white V in a gray circle, and a collapsed section has a white > in a gray circle. Click on the gray circle to toggle. Once you have everything collapsed, expand the Arguments section. The "service" key accepts string or List: string. Both forms want the string to be either a name or a UUID of an appropriate object.
OK, thanks.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
Thu 02 Jul 2026 @ 06:00 PM (CST)
Revolucionando la Seguridad con IA Generativa: Prevención Inteligente en Tiempo RealThu 09 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
Schutz souveräner Workloads: Check Point & die AWS European Sovereign CloudThu 09 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Edge Protection SD-WAN & SASETue 14 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E11: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 3/5 - AI Workforce SecurityThu 30 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E12: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 4/5 - AI GatewayThu 20 Aug 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E13: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Ent 5/5 - AI Research & Threat LandscapeTue 14 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E11: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 3/5 - AI Workforce SecurityThu 30 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E12: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 4/5 - AI GatewayThu 20 Aug 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E13: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Ent 5/5 - AI Research & Threat LandscapeThu 02 Jul 2026 @ 06:00 PM (CST)
Revolucionando la Seguridad con IA Generativa: Prevención Inteligente en Tiempo RealAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY