- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Quantum
- :
- Management
- :
- Re: Disk Extend Problem
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Disk Extend Problem
Hi all,
I currently have a issue where my secondary management server has reached its OS volume capacity and not syncing with my primary. The secondary management server is also acting as the log server (I know, not best practice) and as such our ability to view the logs are down.
I have tried to extend the 'lv_current' partition to match the primary by following sk94671 but this has created a separate volume, 'lv_extended_current'. I would like to remove the newly created and extend the correct volume, any help would be very much appreciated.
Server is hosted in VMWare,
Outputs below from SSH;
============
Size(GB) Used(GB) Configurable Description
lv_current 15 15 yes Check Point OS and products
lv_current_snap 0 0 no Snapshot volume
lv_extended_current 26 26 no Snapshot volume
lv_log 500 441 yes Logs volume
upgrade 17 N/A no Reserved for version upgrade
swap 8 N/A no Swap volume size
free 33 N/A no Unused space
------- ----
total 599 N/A no Total size
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/vg_splat-lv_current
15236080 15100688 0 100% /
/dev/sda1 295561 24107 256194 9% /boot
tmpfs 8149992 0 8149992 0% /dev/shm
/dev/mapper/vg_splat-lv_log
507869624 462259956 19395268 96% /var/log
[Expert@xxxxxx]# fdisk -l
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 13054 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
/dev/sda1 * 1 38 305203+ 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 39 1082 8385930 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda3 1083 13054 96165090 8e Linux LVM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
Would you mind specifying resource for the statement that having secondary management defined as a log server is not a best practice?
Thank you,
Vladimir
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Vladimir,
I have got this information from my current CCSA & CCSE course.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Course and page number where this statement is made? I teach the CCSA/CCSE classes and don't recall a statement like this in the courseware.
--
"IPS Immersion Training" Self-paced Video Class
Now Available at http://www.maxpowerfirewalls.com
March 27th with sessions for both the EMEA and Americas time zones
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Timothy,
Not sure if this is captured in the documentation, haven't doubled checked... I captured this in my own personal notes from the course after a class discussion with the instructor.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Second that guys, once you've got Management HA for instance I have never heard myself that someone dedicated a "function" to the 2nd SMS as Log Server (former CLM). I agree with Tim, never head of it on either courses. That's definitely not a case!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It is contrary to what I was led to believe should be done in management HA, where I explicitly define secondary management as a log destination.
Timothy Hall, can you take a look at this post of mine to validate the accuracy of the statements I've made there? https://community.checkpoint.com/docs/DOC-2922-logging-in-a-single-security-domain
Thank you,
Vladimir
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Added a comment to that thread with a suggestion, looks accurate to me...
--
"IPS Immersion Training" Self-paced Video Class
Now Available at http://www.maxpowerfirewalls.com
March 27th with sessions for both the EMEA and Americas time zones
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I had a similar case where lvm_manager would hang during the extension of a volume, resulting in the same problem with a lv_extended_current snapshot-partition and I got the following suggestion / resolution from ITAC:
In order to remove the lv_extended_current snapshot-volume you can use:lvremove -f /dev/vg_splat/lv_extended_current
As always, know what you're doing and make sure you have a way back if things take an unexpected turn...
Cheers
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you Mikael, this was the same response I got as well, unfortunately did not work and got the following:
lvremove -f /dev/vg_splat/lv_extended_current
/dev/cdrom: open failed: Read-only file system
Can't remove open logical volume "lv_extended_current"
I have been given the following suggestion:
In case this does not succeed, we can suggest to create a new VM with the desired disk size and fresh install the system as sometimes there are issues with disk space on virtual platforms and manipulating it may cause unexpected results.
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Try to reboot the machine in maintenance-mode first.
Since there's probably all kind of locks on the filesystem I think I had to do it in Single-user mode (Mainentance-mode).
Cheers
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Had the same issue as yours and this command worked perfectly fine on Smart-1 405
Many Thanks !
