- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
MVP 2026: Submissions
Are Now Open!
What's New in R82.10?
Watch NowOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
While trying to make my firewalls' configurations more consistent, I noticed something weird. Here it is reproduced on one of my personal boxes:
[Expert@DallasSA]# clish -c "show configuration" | grep snmp
set snmp agent-version any
set snmp community public read-only
set snmp agent-version v3-Only
...
[Expert@DallasSA]# clish
DallasSA> delete snmp community public
NMSSNM0075 SNMP v3-Only does not support community string.
DallasSA> set snmp agent-version any
DallasSA> delete snmp community public
DallasSA> set snmp agent-version v3-only
DallasSA> save config
DallasSA> exit
[Expert@DallasSA]# clish -c "show configuration" | grep snmp
set snmp agent-version v3-Only
...
[Expert@DallasSA]# fw ver
This is Check Point's software version R81.10 - Build 055
[Expert@DallasSA]# cpinfo -y fw1 | grep Take
This is Check Point CPinfo Build 914000239 for GAIA
HOTFIX_R81_10_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 129
It's possible for the clish config to have both "set snmp agent-version any" and "set snmp agent-version v3-Only" in it at the same time. When these lines are both present in the config, you have to enter "set snmp agent-version any" again in order to interact with the v2 community causing the "agent-version any" line to stick around. Once you have deleted it, you can switch to v3-Only and the "agent-version any" line actually goes away.
Seems like at least two minor bugs in clish.
This is by design, not a bug.
This behavior is to save the configuration when switching to version any (v1/v2/v3) or when implementing the configuration on different machine (see PMTR-68517)
Nitzan
This is by design, not a bug.
This behavior is to save the configuration when switching to version any (v1/v2/v3) or when implementing the configuration on different machine (see PMTR-68517)
Nitzan
Btw, customers cant see that PMTR, thats internal to CP employees only, it would seem.
Best,
Andy
Then that is a terrible design on multiple levels.
Those are definitely valid points @Bob_Zimmerman
I get same thing on R81.20 jumbo 41
Andy
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 12 | |
| 10 | |
| 9 | |
| 8 | |
| 6 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 |
Tue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY