Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Dor_Marcovitch
Advisor

Subnet to Subnet NAT

hey,

i have a problem with overlapping networks in S2S connections.

we currently have the configuration currently on our cisco that it performs destination nat based on "network to network" for example:

192.168.1.x -> 10.10.1.x

that way we do not need to configure 100 NAT rules, and the cisco router know to perform NAT for example:

  • 192.168.1.1 to 10.10.1.1 
  • 192.168.1.1 to 10.10.1.1

we have multi[le subnets like this,

thanks 

0 Kudos
6 Replies
G_W_Albrecht
Legend
Legend

And what is the issue here ? You only mention a Cisco device (and not even which one)...

CCSE CCTE SMB Specialist
0 Kudos
Dor_Marcovitch
Advisor

we need to remove this cisco device and move the S2S to be between the 3rd party to our checkpoint GW.

it some cisco router i dont know the model

0 Kudos
G_W_Albrecht
Legend
Legend

But what is the problem you are facing ? You can define these NAT rules on CP easily ! I suggest to read  sk108600: VPN Site-to-Site with 3rd party

CCSE CCTE SMB Specialist
0 Kudos
Dor_Marcovitch
Advisor

the problem is not with phase2, i wonder i f this NAT configuration is supported or not 

0 Kudos
G_W_Albrecht
Legend
Legend

The NAT Rule base let you easily define such configuration - look into Dashboard...

CCSE CCTE SMB Specialist
0 Kudos

I believe what you are looking for is NAT Pools 

0 Kudos