Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Wayne_Hammond
Contributor

E84.20 - Windows Client Disconnects

Hi,

We have noticed the latest Windows update 2004 causes E84.20 to disconnect the PC/Laptop if the user is inactive and the machine locks.

We have had to roll back to an earlier version

Regards

Wayne

13 Replies
HPH
Participant

Hi all,
we have the same issue. After upgrading to E84.20 the vpn-tunnel is disconnected as soon as the machine is locked. I did not find any hint in the release notes for this behavior.

Regards,
Hanspeter

0 Kudos
_Val_
Admin
Admin

What is the value for do_re_authentication_while_session_is_locked in your trac_client_1.ttm file? 

0 Kudos
Wayne_Hammond
Contributor

Hi Val,

 

Where is that file located?

Regards

 

Wayne

0 Kudos
_Val_
Admin
Admin

Look into sk75221 and sk55502

0 Kudos
HPH
Participant

This value does not exist in the trac_client_1.ttm file. My gateway version is R80.10 , my management runs with R80.40. 

0 Kudos
Wayne_Hammond
Contributor

Val,

 

This only affects clients running E84.20.

I am running E83.10 and have no issues

I am not sure changing the FW files will help?

Regards

Wayne

0 Kudos
_Val_
Admin
Admin

I would try this first, and then, if not effective, open a TAC case

0 Kudos
ramilu
Participant

Hi Wayne,

Did you find some solution for this issue either with TAC or by changing the value in the trac file?

Thanks.

Ralitsa

0 Kudos
AndreiR
Employee
Employee

Folks,

I apologize for inconvenience.

This is known issue which happens with E84.20. It has already been fixed in E84.30.

It is also listed in Known Limitations and has dedicated SK:

https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&solut...

0 Kudos
ramilu
Participant

Many thanks for the prompt reply!

0 Kudos
Tobias_Moritz
Advisor

The sk says "The issue happens on E84.20 version only and and has been fixed in E84.30 release."

You say "This is known issue which happens with E84.20 and E84.30. It has already been fixed in E84.40"

What is right? 🙂

AndreiR
Employee
Employee

@Tobias_Moritz , you are correct. It has already been fixed in E84.30. I have updated my original reply.

0 Kudos
Wayne_Hammond
Contributor

Thanks all for your replies 

0 Kudos

Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.

Upcoming Events

    CheckMates Events