With all due respect, my claim is 100% true and there are soooo many examples of it, just search your internal R&D database with sxl tasks, Im sure you will get tired of seeing how many tasks there are about it. By the way, I recall back in R60, CP support kept saying sxl will be better in R65 (which it was NOT), then in R70 (which it was NOT), R75 (same thing), R76 (probably the worst ever), R77 (okay, little improvement) and now in R80, its a HOT MESS. What I dont personally understand is why you guys keep pushing this lie that securexl is so wonderful and it works well, well its not true and check point knows that, but are you too proud to admit it does not work right? I mean, any honest person/business would admit a mistake and fix it (isnt that what any customer would expect anyway?), rather than making these jumbo hotfixes and saying that there are sxl fixes in them (another lie clearly).
Its truly a shame, because you have a decent product, but this problem, in my opinion, will NEVER be fixed properly, because you guys had 15 yeats to fix it and it never happened. To say it works in R80.40, no it does NOT, because I dealt with dozens customers who had really bad traffic issues/slowness when sxl was on and even TAC told them to keep it disabled, because it would take long time for R&D to find a fix. Im sorry, but if your own employees know sxl is bad, I think I rest my case :).