Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Vladimir
Champion
Champion

R80++ upgrade replacing topology definitions

Encountered this at one of my clients: In R77.30 they had multiple interfaces defined as "External" in topology.

I do not want to debate how and if it was wrong to do so, but the fact remains that the upgrade process changed those to "this network":

77.30_topology.png

 

80.30_topology.png

0 Kudos
3 Replies
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

Yeah that definitely shouldn't happen.
0 Kudos
Vladimir
Champion
Champion

I am not sure if client will be opening the case on this, as they have lived with this post-upgrade for a while.

Do you think you can kick it up to R&D to get their read on it for future references?

I still have the environment in my lab and may be able to get additional data if they need it or are unable to reproduce.

 

Thanks,

Vladimir

0 Kudos
Marco_Valenti
Advisor

I had a similar issue with r80.30 upgrade tool , it mess up with the antispoofing group assigned to the interface  in the source version (r77.30) I have an open sr with the tac at the moment

0 Kudos

Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.

Upcoming Events

    CheckMates Events