- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Step Into the Future of
AI-Powered Cyber Security
The State of Ransomware Q1 2026
Key Trends and Their Impact
AI Security Masters E8:
Claude Mythos: New Era in Cyber Security
Blueprint Architecture for Securing
The AI Factory & AI Data Center
Call For Papers
Your Expertise. Our Stage
CheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
ICAP integration for R77.30 and R80.10

Configuring ICAP Server on Check Point Sandblast Appliance (TEX) or Gateway:
Enable ICAP server on TEX appliance see SK111306 and configure thread rules in Smart DashBoard.
Use hotfix 286 or higher for R77.30.
Tip!
You can use more ICAP Server in "Web Content Layer" on Bluecoat SG for example CAS appliance and TEX appliance.
Enable ICAP Server
Start ICAP server on TEX appliance or gateway:
# icap_server start
Enable ICAP Logs
# tecli advanced remote emulator logs enable <<< Hotfix 286 or higher automatically activates logging.
Enable firewall rule to connect ICAP Server (TEX Appliance)
Source: Symantec SG
Destination: "ip-address of sandblast appliance"
Port: 1344
Configure Thread Rules
Configure Thread rules in SmartDashboard
Configuring ICAP on Symantec SWG:







Regards,
Hello Heiko,
I am looking for documentation for F5 LTM i2600 integration with Sandblast appliance. Do you have one?
Thank you!
Regards,
Coco
Hi Coco,
On F5 side this is a bit problematic. You can't limit the number of ICAP sessions. For example, if the TE appliance is set to 100 sessions and you open the 101 session, you will get an ICAP error.
Unfortunately, this cannot be adjusted on the F5 side. I have already opened a ticket at F5. But so far without success.
On the TE Appliance you have to configure it as described in my articles:
Symantec (Bluecoat) SG ICAP and Sandblast (TEX)
Fortigate Firewall ICAP and Sandblast (TEX)
Here you can find an article how it works with F5:
AskF5 | Manual Chapter: Configuring Content Adaptation for HTTP Requests
Regards
Thank you for the sharing Heiko! ![]()
In my design, customer will have F5 LTM work with 2-3 Sandblast appliances. In this case, will LTM be able to deliver the 101 session to next available Sandblast appliance? Thank you!
Regards,
Coco
Hi Coco,
it is the same issue! The problem is only shifted (100* 3 Te appliances). So you have the ICAP error of the 301 connection. With Bluecoat or Fortigate you can define the upper limit "max ICAP connections". With F5 this is unfortunately not possible. This means that this can always be a problem if it is exceeded. I have not found a solution yet.
Regards,
Hello Mr. Heiko, congratulations for your exceptional knowledge about security and deep configuration of checkpoint products. Can I ask you for a new document about icap integration with symantec DLP sever using the new capabilities of icap client on r80.20?
Thank you so much.
Regards.
Alessandro
Sorry, I have no experience with R80.20 and ICAP yet.
I'll try that out in the next few days.
Thank you!
More coming soon!
Thank's for this info.
Heiko
Testing at the moment with R80.20 and R80.30EA.
More coming soon.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 25 | |
| 11 | |
| 11 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 |
Tue 12 May 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Cloud Firewall delivered as a serviceWed 13 May 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
TechTalk: The State of Ransomware Q1 2026: Key Trends and Their ImpactThu 14 May 2026 @ 07:00 PM (EEST)
Under the Hood: Presentando Check Point Cloud Firewall como ServicioTue 12 May 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Cloud Firewall delivered as a serviceAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY