<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Link Aggregation in Spark Firewall (SMB)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178676#M8785</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;802.3AD = LACP and is the usual standard for bonding. Needs to be aligned with your switch settings.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Assigned to will depend if you are wanting to use VLANs on this bond (trunk) or just a straight IP address (access).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On the "Advanced" tab you may also wish to change the Hashing to Layer 3+4 depending on requirements.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 02:39:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-04-21T02:39:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Link Aggregation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178671#M8780</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; We have a 1550 appliance and recently installed 2GB/2GB fiber. The ethernet cable is coming out of the ONT directly into the 1550 which is doing DHCP. I am wanting to bond together port 3 and 4 and send those out to our UniFi 2.5GB compatible switch so certain workstations can take advantage of the connection. I have the ports aggregated on the switch, but can't figure it out on the checkpoint appliance. Any one help?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 01:51:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178671#M8780</guid>
      <dc:creator>ndgaham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-21T01:51:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Aggregation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178672#M8781</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Some more info that I failed to mention:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Checkpoint is getting static IP from ISP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. There is a second switch that is gigabit only.&amp;nbsp; The 2.5GB switch is new due to the internet and 2.5GB cards have been installed in the computers.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 01:56:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178672#M8781</guid>
      <dc:creator>ndgaham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-21T01:56:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Aggregation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178673#M8782</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Which firmware version are you using?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Device &amp;gt; Local Network &amp;gt; Select LANx interface &amp;gt; Edit&lt;BR /&gt;Remove interfaces from the LAN switch by setting to "Unassigned"&amp;nbsp; (repeat this for two ports/interfaces)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Device &amp;gt; Local Network &amp;gt; New &amp;gt; Bond (Link Aggregation)&lt;BR /&gt;Complete setup of your Bond interface&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 02:34:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178673#M8782</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-21T02:34:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Aggregation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178674#M8783</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;R81.10&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 01:59:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178674#M8783</guid>
      <dc:creator>ndgaham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-21T01:59:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Aggregation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178675#M8784</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm confused on what to select for operation mode as well as the Assigned to portion&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 02:00:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178675#M8784</guid>
      <dc:creator>ndgaham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-21T02:00:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Aggregation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178676#M8785</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;802.3AD = LACP and is the usual standard for bonding. Needs to be aligned with your switch settings.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Assigned to will depend if you are wanting to use VLANs on this bond (trunk) or just a straight IP address (access).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On the "Advanced" tab you may also wish to change the Hashing to Layer 3+4 depending on requirements.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 02:39:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178676#M8785</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-21T02:39:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Aggregation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178760#M8796</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Thanks! This was super helpful and I got this setup. I think my only bottleneck that I have now is coming from our ONT into the WAN port on the checkpoint. Is the WAN port gigabit? I only have one ethernet out coming from the ONT.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 19:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178760#M8796</guid>
      <dc:creator>ndgaham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-21T19:41:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Aggregation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178777#M8797</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Thanks! This was super helpful and I got this setup. I think my only bottleneck that I have now is coming from our ONT into the WAN port on the checkpoint. Is the WAN port gigabit? I only have one ethernet out coming from the ONT. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 20:25:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178777#M8797</guid>
      <dc:creator>ndgaham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-21T20:25:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Aggregation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178819#M8798</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Correct 1Gbps.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Appliance throughput specs a side for the moment you might&amp;nbsp; work around that with an intermediate switch.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Otherwise an 1600/1800 might be better suited to requirements with the native link speeds involved.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2023 02:57:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178819#M8798</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-23T02:57:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Aggregation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178944#M8807</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Gotcha - so if I went out from the ONT, into a switch, link aggregated out from the switch into the WAN port and another port on the 1550, then back out with link agg to the switch, theoretically, could I get 2Gbps through the 1550?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 13:51:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178944#M8807</guid>
      <dc:creator>ndgaham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-24T13:51:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Aggregation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178952#M8808</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;2Gbps throughput for the 1550 is not realistic based on real world traffic and it's protection capabilities but the topology change would address the interface level element.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 14:42:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Link-Aggregation/m-p/178952#M8808</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-24T14:42:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

