<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Quantum Spark 1600 Zone based Routing in Spark Firewall (SMB)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Quantum-Spark-1600-Zone-based-Routing/m-p/159714#M7579</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok I will check this out and update the result but we can't group or zone the WAN interfaces together and create policies with them.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 10:41:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>arsathparves</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-17T10:41:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Quantum Spark 1600 Zone based Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Quantum-Spark-1600-Zone-based-Routing/m-p/159675#M7575</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Checkmates&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have 3 WAN links A,B &amp;amp; C so what I'm looking to do is keep WAN A &amp;amp; B in a single network group or Zone and route all traffic through them and if incase a link or both WAN links goes down failover happens to WAN C or load shares with the available link , is this possible in R80 or R81 embedded Gaia locally managed SMB 1600 appliance ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;#SMB 1600 R80.20 R81.10&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 06:31:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Quantum-Spark-1600-Zone-based-Routing/m-p/159675#M7575</guid>
      <dc:creator>arsathparves</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-17T06:31:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quantum Spark 1600 Zone based Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Quantum-Spark-1600-Zone-based-Routing/m-p/159689#M7576</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can set a weight when in load-sharing mode.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Additionally you can also bond interfaces, what type of links/interfaces are they?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 08:56:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Quantum-Spark-1600-Zone-based-Routing/m-p/159689#M7576</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-17T08:56:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quantum Spark 1600 Zone based Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Quantum-Spark-1600-Zone-based-Routing/m-p/159692#M7577</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes I'm able to set weight for load sharing but my doubt was when is keep the Load sharing mode instead of HA mode all the 3 links are sharing the load that why I want to zone/group WAN A &amp;amp; B together so that I can keep them as active link and keep WAN C as failover link.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible to Bond WAN interfaces ?&amp;nbsp; on WAN port I have ISP A and DMZ port I have ISP B I can bond them ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 09:08:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Quantum-Spark-1600-Zone-based-Routing/m-p/159692#M7577</guid>
      <dc:creator>arsathparves</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-17T09:08:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quantum Spark 1600 Zone based Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Quantum-Spark-1600-Zone-based-Routing/m-p/159704#M7578</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="Menu_Options"&gt;Will likely depend on the link type... p&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="Menu_Options"&gt;er the admin guide:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="Menu_Options"&gt;Link aggregation (&lt;SPAN class="SearchHighlight SearchHighlight1"&gt;Bond&lt;/SPAN&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;- Create a link between two or more interfaces. This improves performance and redundancy by increasing the network throughput and bandwidth. A WAN or LAN&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="SearchHighlight SearchHighlight1"&gt;bond&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;can act like a regular internet connection in the cluster flow. A WAN&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="SearchHighlight SearchHighlight1"&gt;bond&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;in a cluster can be a monitoring interface.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Source:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/SMB_R80.20.40/AdminGuides/Locally_Managed/EN/Topics/Configuring-Internet-Connectivity.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/SMB_R80.20.40/AdminGuides/Locally_Managed/EN/Topics/Configuring-Internet-Connectivity.htm&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 09:50:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Quantum-Spark-1600-Zone-based-Routing/m-p/159704#M7578</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-17T09:50:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quantum Spark 1600 Zone based Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Quantum-Spark-1600-Zone-based-Routing/m-p/159714#M7579</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok I will check this out and update the result but we can't group or zone the WAN interfaces together and create policies with them.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 10:41:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Quantum-Spark-1600-Zone-based-Routing/m-p/159714#M7579</guid>
      <dc:creator>arsathparves</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-17T10:41:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quantum Spark 1600 Zone based Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Quantum-Spark-1600-Zone-based-Routing/m-p/159715#M7580</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Further granularity may be possible pending the future release of SD-WAN, if you have specific requirements I suggest discussing them with your local Check Point SE who can raise any applicable RFEs that might be needed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 10:47:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Quantum-Spark-1600-Zone-based-Routing/m-p/159715#M7580</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-17T10:47:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

