<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: HA cluster and cisco stack switch in Spark Firewall (SMB)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/HA-cluster-and-cisco-stack-switch/m-p/156097#M7294</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3630"&gt;@Chris_Atkinson&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;is absolutely right, if there wont be multiple VLANS on that uplink, then you dont need a trunk, just access port.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:02:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-08-31T14:02:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HA cluster and cisco stack switch</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/HA-cluster-and-cisco-stack-switch/m-p/156081#M7290</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did HA deployment using quantum spark 1590 (Active /Passive)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I aslo run two cisco switches as stack. One uplink cable connect from actvie switch to active firewall and one cable are connected from standby switch to standby firewall. I also configure HA monitoring in those two interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So i would like to know those both switch interface should run portfast ( stp disable) ? Should i turn on stp on both ports ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should i disable HA monitoring on those two interfaces on firewall.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/HA-cluster-and-cisco-stack-switch/m-p/156081#M7290</guid>
      <dc:creator>RioAung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-31T13:19:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA cluster and cisco stack switch</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/HA-cluster-and-cisco-stack-switch/m-p/156082#M7291</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Typically portfast or portfast edge if trunk but it depends on your LAN side config.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Understand your concern given the built-in switching element of the 1500.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:57:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/HA-cluster-and-cisco-stack-switch/m-p/156082#M7291</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-31T13:57:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA cluster and cisco stack switch</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/HA-cluster-and-cisco-stack-switch/m-p/156087#M7292</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3630"&gt;@Chris_Atkinson&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I didn't configure trunk. I use as access port because i use one vlan.if access port ,should be portfast /edge port ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;should i configure trunk ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:34:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/HA-cluster-and-cisco-stack-switch/m-p/156087#M7292</guid>
      <dc:creator>RioAung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-31T13:34:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA cluster and cisco stack switch</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/HA-cluster-and-cisco-stack-switch/m-p/156088#M7293</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you don't need multiple vlans on the uplink then it's not necessary to configure a trunk.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you are wary you could use the DMZ port or otherwise ensure the LAN port in question is the only member of that network and remove/unassign the others.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:58:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/HA-cluster-and-cisco-stack-switch/m-p/156088#M7293</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-31T13:58:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA cluster and cisco stack switch</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/HA-cluster-and-cisco-stack-switch/m-p/156097#M7294</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3630"&gt;@Chris_Atkinson&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;is absolutely right, if there wont be multiple VLANS on that uplink, then you dont need a trunk, just access port.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:02:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/HA-cluster-and-cisco-stack-switch/m-p/156097#M7294</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-31T14:02:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

