topic Re: Could ISP redundancy apply to site-to-site vpn on central managed 1590 gateway in Spark Firewall (SMB) https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Re-Could-ISP-redundancy-apply-to-site-to-site-vpn-on-central/m-p/141752#M6405 <P>Seems to be a platform issue, checking</P> Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:51:57 GMT _Val_ 2022-02-17T09:51:57Z Re: Could ISP redundancy apply to site-to-site vpn on central managed 1590 gateway https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Re-Could-ISP-redundancy-apply-to-site-to-site-vpn-on-central/m-p/141740#M6401 <P><a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/7">@PhoneBoy</a>&nbsp;, can you move this post to SMB ?</P> Thu, 17 Feb 2022 08:11:58 GMT https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Re-Could-ISP-redundancy-apply-to-site-to-site-vpn-on-central/m-p/141740#M6401 G_W_Albrecht 2022-02-17T08:11:58Z Re: Could ISP redundancy apply to site-to-site vpn on central managed 1590 gateway https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Re-Could-ISP-redundancy-apply-to-site-to-site-vpn-on-central/m-p/141744#M6402 <P>Hey&nbsp;<a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/21294">@G_W_Albrecht</a>&nbsp;are you doing it on purpose, tagging PhoneBoy but not me? <span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:">🙂</span><BR /><BR />Moved</P> Thu, 17 Feb 2022 08:55:24 GMT https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Re-Could-ISP-redundancy-apply-to-site-to-site-vpn-on-central/m-p/141744#M6402 _Val_ 2022-02-17T08:55:24Z Re: Could ISP redundancy apply to site-to-site vpn on central managed 1590 gateway https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Re-Could-ISP-redundancy-apply-to-site-to-site-vpn-on-central/m-p/141749#M6403 <P>Sorry!</P> Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:38:59 GMT https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Re-Could-ISP-redundancy-apply-to-site-to-site-vpn-on-central/m-p/141749#M6403 G_W_Albrecht 2022-02-17T09:38:59Z Re: Could ISP redundancy apply to site-to-site vpn on central managed 1590 gateway https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Re-Could-ISP-redundancy-apply-to-site-to-site-vpn-on-central/m-p/141751#M6404 <P>Original post has disappeared ?</P> Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:49:11 GMT https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Re-Could-ISP-redundancy-apply-to-site-to-site-vpn-on-central/m-p/141751#M6404 G_W_Albrecht 2022-02-17T09:49:11Z Re: Could ISP redundancy apply to site-to-site vpn on central managed 1590 gateway https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Re-Could-ISP-redundancy-apply-to-site-to-site-vpn-on-central/m-p/141752#M6405 <P>Seems to be a platform issue, checking</P> Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:51:57 GMT https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Re-Could-ISP-redundancy-apply-to-site-to-site-vpn-on-central/m-p/141752#M6405 _Val_ 2022-02-17T09:51:57Z