<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Encryption of connections originating from Centrally managed SMB in Spark Firewall (SMB)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Encryption-of-connections-originating-from-Centrally-managed-SMB/m-p/14217#M347</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A "Why" question is placed wrongly here - and y&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;ou can always issue an RFE in&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.checkpoint.com/rfe/rfe.htm" rel="nofollow" style="color: #6d6e71; background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px; text-decoration: none; padding: 0px calc(12px + 0.35ex) 0px 0px;"&gt;Products and Feature Suggestions&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:03:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-10T11:03:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Encryption of connections originating from Centrally managed SMB</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Encryption-of-connections-originating-from-Centrally-managed-SMB/m-p/14216#M346</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The question is mostly for relevant Checkpoint employees, but&amp;nbsp;other's comments and suggestions are welcome as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why "Do not encrypt connections originating from the local gateway" is available only for the Locally managed SMBs, and is not available for the ones managed Centrally?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When there are many tens of the Centrally managed SMBs,&amp;nbsp;it gets cumbersome to maintain the crypt.def file, especially when SMB's WAN address is dynamically assigned.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2018 15:13:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Encryption-of-connections-originating-from-Centrally-managed-SMB/m-p/14216#M346</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maxim_Mogorean</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-08T15:13:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Encryption of connections originating from Centrally managed SMB</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Encryption-of-connections-originating-from-Centrally-managed-SMB/m-p/14217#M347</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A "Why" question is placed wrongly here - and y&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;ou can always issue an RFE in&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.checkpoint.com/rfe/rfe.htm" rel="nofollow" style="color: #6d6e71; background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px; text-decoration: none; padding: 0px calc(12px + 0.35ex) 0px 0px;"&gt;Products and Feature Suggestions&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:03:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Encryption-of-connections-originating-from-Centrally-managed-SMB/m-p/14217#M347</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-10T11:03:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Encryption of connections originating from Centrally managed SMB</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Encryption-of-connections-originating-from-Centrally-managed-SMB/m-p/14218#M348</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Following&amp;nbsp;sk116097, an alternative is to use VTI instead of Domain-Based VPN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Encryption-of-connections-originating-from-Centrally-managed-SMB/m-p/14218#M348</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-10T12:13:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

