<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Two Layer 3 Interfaces on 1500 in Spark Firewall (SMB)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Two-Layer-3-Interfaces-on-1500/m-p/70521#M2724</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;G_W_Albrecht,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've been reading through the 1500's documentation to see if it fits our requirements but couldn't find a solid answer.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We need to create two layer 3 interfaces (inside and a single DMZ), -no direct internet link/access- couple of static routes, 3-4 rules with one of them using IA and managed centrally.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Will a 1550 be able to address the above, mainly the two layer3 interfaces?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 03:03:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>_Daniel_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-16T03:03:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Two Layer 3 Interfaces on 1500</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Two-Layer-3-Interfaces-on-1500/m-p/70521#M2724</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;G_W_Albrecht,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've been reading through the 1500's documentation to see if it fits our requirements but couldn't find a solid answer.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We need to create two layer 3 interfaces (inside and a single DMZ), -no direct internet link/access- couple of static routes, 3-4 rules with one of them using IA and managed centrally.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Will a 1550 be able to address the above, mainly the two layer3 interfaces?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 03:03:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Two-Layer-3-Interfaces-on-1500/m-p/70521#M2724</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Daniel_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-16T03:03:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two Layer 3 Interfaces on 1500</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Two-Layer-3-Interfaces-on-1500/m-p/70531#M2725</link>
      <description>I forked this from the announcement thread.&lt;BR /&gt;Even if this gateway doesn't have Internet access, you'd should be able to accomplish this.&lt;BR /&gt;I assume the "WAN" link could effectively be used as the DMZ in this case, particularly if there is no Internet access.&lt;BR /&gt;And yes, it can be centrally managed, or will be once R80.40 ships and/or management of 1500 series appliances is integrated into the R80.30 JHF.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 03:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Two-Layer-3-Interfaces-on-1500/m-p/70531#M2725</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-16T03:09:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two Layer 3 Interfaces on 1500</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Two-Layer-3-Interfaces-on-1500/m-p/70538#M2726</link>
      <description>There is one issue that you will run into, unless this has been resolved in the R80.20 software, that is that you cannot set a default route to any other interface than the internet interface.&lt;BR /&gt;The way around this is by adding 2 routes:&lt;BR /&gt;route 0.0.0.0 128.0.0.0 to the nexthop and &lt;BR /&gt;route 128.0.0.0 128.0.0.0 to the nexthop.&lt;BR /&gt;You can use the DMZ interface for the DMZ and any LAN interface for the other.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 05:52:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Two-Layer-3-Interfaces-on-1500/m-p/70538#M2726</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-16T05:52:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two Layer 3 Interfaces on 1500</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Two-Layer-3-Interfaces-on-1500/m-p/70644#M2729</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;15x0 can currently be centrally managed by R80.30 JT 111 !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:52:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Two-Layer-3-Interfaces-on-1500/m-p/70644#M2729</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-17T10:52:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

