https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Spark-Asymmetric-Routing-Support/m-p/255113#M13084 <P>Short answer is 'yes', you just have to turn off anti-spoofing.</P> <P>Longer answer is 'why' with a lot of discussion around why asymmetric routing is best avoided.</P> Thu, 14 Aug 2025 03:45:03 GMT emmap 2025-08-14T03:45:03Z https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Spark-Asymmetric-Routing-Support/m-p/255109#M13083 <P>Hello!</P><P>We would like to conduct an asymmetric (asymmetric) test between the Fortinet firewall and the checkpoint firewall.<BR />Does Spark support asymmetric routing?<BR />It's even better to have an official document.<BR />Please give us your opinion<BR />Thank you.</P> Thu, 14 Aug 2025 01:10:09 GMT https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Spark-Asymmetric-Routing-Support/m-p/255109#M13083 joon 2025-08-14T01:10:09Z https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Spark-Asymmetric-Routing-Support/m-p/255113#M13084 <P>Short answer is 'yes', you just have to turn off anti-spoofing.</P> <P>Longer answer is 'why' with a lot of discussion around why asymmetric routing is best avoided.</P> Thu, 14 Aug 2025 03:45:03 GMT https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Spark-Asymmetric-Routing-Support/m-p/255113#M13084 emmap 2025-08-14T03:45:03Z https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Spark-Asymmetric-Routing-Support/m-p/255117#M13085 <P>Further to Emma's response it would be helpful to understand the requirement further.</P> <P>Some scenarios may require "stateful" protections to be modified accordingly.</P> <P>Is this a central or locally managed deployment and are you able to share a diagram of the proposed test case?</P> Thu, 14 Aug 2025 07:19:25 GMT https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Spark-Asymmetric-Routing-Support/m-p/255117#M13085 Chris_Atkinson 2025-08-14T07:19:25Z