<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Port 264 on SMB Gateway in Spark Firewall (SMB)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Port-264-on-SMB-Gateway/m-p/253638#M12955</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Mostly this is a legacy thing, there are existing SKs on this topic please refer&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;sk132712 &amp;amp;&amp;nbsp;sk147415 amongst others.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Please contact TAC if you require further clarification / assistance with the necessary changes.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-22T00:05:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Port 264 on SMB Gateway</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Port-264-on-SMB-Gateway/m-p/253574#M12954</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Mates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Recently, I received a threat alert on one of our SMB gateways, which is managed by Infinity Portal. The alert shows that port 264 is exposed. According to &lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk52421" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;SK52421&lt;/A&gt;, this port is used for topology download from the security gateway (via the FWD daemon) to SecuRemote (build 4100 and higher) and SecureClient. I would like to know if this port is necessary and, if so, whether it is possible and meaningful to limit access to this port to specific IPs or domains.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* There is an S2S VPN and an RA-VPN on this SMB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* The SMB runs on R81.10.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Soroosh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 12:46:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Port-264-on-SMB-Gateway/m-p/253574#M12954</guid>
      <dc:creator>Soroosh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-21T12:46:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Port 264 on SMB Gateway</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Port-264-on-SMB-Gateway/m-p/253638#M12955</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Mostly this is a legacy thing, there are existing SKs on this topic please refer&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;sk132712 &amp;amp;&amp;nbsp;sk147415 amongst others.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Please contact TAC if you require further clarification / assistance with the necessary changes.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/Port-264-on-SMB-Gateway/m-p/253638#M12955</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-22T00:05:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

