<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: About ISP Redundancy monitor in Spark Firewall (SMB)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243054#M12163</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Before anything else, can you please state the appliance model and SW version in use?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 11:51:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-03-05T11:51:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>About ISP Redundancy monitor</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243050#M12162</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Expert,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I tested ISP Redundancy, I found that it is not compatible with PBR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is structure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="1.PNG" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29804i9C6834E0CE56F558/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="1.PNG" alt="1.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So I changed to use two next hops on the static route, and use priority to divide the primary and the secondary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2.PNG" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29805i2DBD5E28E24C4E7C/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="2.PNG" alt="2.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found out that the only way to checkpoint to make sure the route works is to make sure the next hop is viable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, if I turn off Gi0/0 on S3 it switches to the second line for service, but if I turn off Gi0/1 on S3 the checkpoint continues to the first line without switching.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a way to configure the first line to ping the IP of the external network? (transparent monitor)&lt;BR /&gt;For example, ping 8.8.8.8 through 30.30.30.30 to make sure that this line can reach the external network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 09:38:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243050#M12162</guid>
      <dc:creator>michaelyang123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-05T09:38:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: About ISP Redundancy monitor</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243054#M12163</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Before anything else, can you please state the appliance model and SW version in use?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 11:51:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243054#M12163</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-05T11:51:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: About ISP Redundancy monitor</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243061#M12165</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;According to&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;sk167135, PBR is not supported with ISP redundancy.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 12:00:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243061#M12165</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-05T12:00:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: About ISP Redundancy monitor</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243063#M12167</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/181"&gt;@_Val_&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know PBR is not supported with ISP redundancy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I changed to use two next hops on the static route, and use priority to divide the primary and the secondary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to configure the first line to ping the IP of the external network? (like transparent monitor)&lt;BR /&gt;For example, ping 8.8.8.8 through 30.30.30.30 to make sure that this line can reach the external network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All my device models are VE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 12:08:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243063#M12167</guid>
      <dc:creator>michaelyang123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-05T12:08:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: About ISP Redundancy monitor</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243091#M12170</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe this will do what you're after:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk102848" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk102848&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 15:34:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243091#M12170</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-05T15:34:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: About ISP Redundancy monitor</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243100#M12171</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/7"&gt;@PhoneBoy&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I didn't use ISP redundancy because it's not compatible with PBR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to my setup&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I thought the setup was to ping 8.8.8.8 via this path (30.30.30.30), but it turns out it is just the device that has to ping 8.8.8.8, regardless of the path!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="3.PNG" style="width: 427px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29818iD9424609086FE91B/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="3.PNG" alt="3.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 15:58:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243100#M12171</guid>
      <dc:creator>michaelyang123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-05T15:58:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: About ISP Redundancy monitor</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243215#M12184</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This may be a limitation, I would check with TAC.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:12:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243215#M12184</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-07T00:12:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: About ISP Redundancy monitor</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243478#M12234</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;you only need one default route - the ISP redundancy configuration is done using the smart console - Gateways and servers - open the gateway object - others tab - ISP redundancy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.20/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.20_SecurityGateway_Guide/Content/Topics-FWG/ISP-Redundancy-Configuration.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.20/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.20_SecurityGateway_Guide/Content/Topics-FWG/ISP-Redundancy-Configuration.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 01:17:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243478#M12234</guid>
      <dc:creator>DeltaUnit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-11T01:17:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: About ISP Redundancy monitor</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243480#M12235</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/87914"&gt;@DeltaUnit&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since I'm going to use PBR, I won't consider using "ISP redundancy" function because it's not compatible.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 02:28:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Spark-Firewall-SMB/About-ISP-Redundancy-monitor/m-p/243480#M12235</guid>
      <dc:creator>michaelyang123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-11T02:28:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

