topic Quantum SMB 1600 appliance - Can not check if FW is using the recommended Jumbo Hotfix Take in Spark Firewall (SMB)

Quantum SMB 1600 appliance - Can not check if FW is using the recommended Jumbo Hotfix Take

madne_55 — Thu, 12 Dec 2024 09:53:25 GMT

Q - SMB 1600 appliance - HA Cluster

OS Version: R81.10.10 Build 2993

Message only from cluster members:

Can not check if FW is using the recommended Jombo Hotfix Take.

Reason: Gateway didn't provide information.

What can I do here to "force" gateway to provide information?

Or should I just ignore the message?

Re: Quantum SMB 1600 appliance - Can not check if FW is using the recommended Jumbo Hotfix Take

Chris_Atkinson — Thu, 12 Dec 2024 10:02:51 GMT

You can mostly ignore this message as SMB / Spark gateways don't leverage traditional JHF or Jumbos.

R81.10.15 is the latest image, R81.10.10 remains the recommended per sk179615.

Re: Quantum SMB 1600 appliance - Can not check if FW is using the recommended Jumbo Hotfix Take

Lesley — Thu, 12 Dec 2024 10:58:44 GMT

Where do you see these messages? Doctor spark, hcp or in a report?

Re: Quantum SMB 1600 appliance - Can not check if FW is using the recommended Jumbo Hotfix Take

madne_55 — Fri, 13 Dec 2024 11:06:33 GMT

I see this message in GATEWAYS&SERVERS window - message is presented in from of gray dot i Column: Version. So if you hower over dot it presents message.

Re: Quantum SMB 1600 appliance - Can not check if FW is using the recommended Jumbo Hotfix Take

Lesley — Fri, 13 Dec 2024 21:49:20 GMT

I see, can you confirm that the firewall object itself has been set to the correct type? From top of my mind you have to select the correct hardware and i think also that it is a Gaia embedded spark unit.

Re: Quantum SMB 1600 appliance - Can not check if FW is using the recommended Jumbo Hotfix Take

G_W_Albrecht — Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:45:51 GMT

Just ignore the message - for central management, it is hard to differentiate between GAiA and GAiA Embedded even when the correct hardware is selected. But this is a cosmetic issue only...