<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Macfee Sidewinder to CheckPoint R80.10 migration in SmartMove</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SmartMove/Macfee-Sidewinder-to-CheckPoint-R80-10-migration/m-p/86366#M242</link>
    <description>I don't believe Sidewinder is one of the supported options for SmartMove, nor as I've seen many requests for this sort of conversion.&lt;BR /&gt;You'll probably have to migrate that part of the configuration manually.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 15:42:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-26T15:42:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Macfee Sidewinder to CheckPoint R80.10 migration</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SmartMove/Macfee-Sidewinder-to-CheckPoint-R80-10-migration/m-p/86210#M238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How can I migrate Macfee Sidewinder to CheckPoint R80.10?&lt;BR /&gt;My plan is to use the PaloAlto Expedition to convert first and then convert to CheckPoint. but when I convert NAT does not appear.&lt;BR /&gt;Does anyone have experiences with Sidewinder to CheckPoint R80.10?&lt;BR /&gt;Please advise me.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2020 11:24:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SmartMove/Macfee-Sidewinder-to-CheckPoint-R80-10-migration/m-p/86210#M238</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paing</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-25T11:24:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Macfee Sidewinder to CheckPoint R80.10 migration</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SmartMove/Macfee-Sidewinder-to-CheckPoint-R80-10-migration/m-p/86265#M239</link>
      <description>Why R80.10 and not R80.30 or R80.40?&lt;BR /&gt;And also what tool are you using to migrate from Palo to Check Point?&lt;BR /&gt;And have you verified the correct configuration appears in a Palo?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2020 20:25:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SmartMove/Macfee-Sidewinder-to-CheckPoint-R80-10-migration/m-p/86265#M239</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-25T20:25:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Macfee Sidewinder to CheckPoint R80.10 migration</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SmartMove/Macfee-Sidewinder-to-CheckPoint-R80-10-migration/m-p/86275#M240</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Why R80.10 and not R80.30 or R80.40?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Customer environment is currently running R80.10 and planning for R80.30 (later)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;And also what tool are you using to migrate from Palo to Check Point?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do CheckPoint API for that. (Export CSV from Paloalto)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;And have you verified the correct configuration appears in a Palo?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;PaloAlto expedition can't migrate NAT rules.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;Checkpoint has tools or instructions for Macfee Sidewinder to CheckPoint directly convert.?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 02:13:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SmartMove/Macfee-Sidewinder-to-CheckPoint-R80-10-migration/m-p/86275#M240</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paing</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-26T02:13:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Macfee Sidewinder to CheckPoint R80.10 migration</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SmartMove/Macfee-Sidewinder-to-CheckPoint-R80-10-migration/m-p/86306#M241</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If NAT rules are the only thing that is not convertible i would make new CP NAT rules after the migration. As you have to optimize the rule base anyway that should be not much effort.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 08:45:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SmartMove/Macfee-Sidewinder-to-CheckPoint-R80-10-migration/m-p/86306#M241</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-26T08:45:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Macfee Sidewinder to CheckPoint R80.10 migration</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SmartMove/Macfee-Sidewinder-to-CheckPoint-R80-10-migration/m-p/86366#M242</link>
      <description>I don't believe Sidewinder is one of the supported options for SmartMove, nor as I've seen many requests for this sort of conversion.&lt;BR /&gt;You'll probably have to migrate that part of the configuration manually.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 15:42:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SmartMove/Macfee-Sidewinder-to-CheckPoint-R80-10-migration/m-p/86366#M242</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-26T15:42:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Macfee Sidewinder to CheckPoint R80.10 migration</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SmartMove/Macfee-Sidewinder-to-CheckPoint-R80-10-migration/m-p/86483#M243</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for all your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Migrate from Macfee Sidewinder to CheckPoint is I used CheckPoint API and also NAT rules&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Export active rules from Sidewinder CSV file and create API. Object, services, and NAT also.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for all your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Paing&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 13:30:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SmartMove/Macfee-Sidewinder-to-CheckPoint-R80-10-migration/m-p/86483#M243</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paing</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-27T13:30:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

