<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: check point mobile site question in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112702#M9075</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It will not help in your case, as your clients already changed it to the IP which they resolved.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But to don't run into the same issue again, you can enable the following in "trac_client_1.ttm" on gateways with RemoteAccess:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;:enable_gw_resolving (
        :gateway (
                :default (true)
        )
)
:mep_mode (
        :gateway (
                :map (
                        :dns_based (dns_based)
                        :first_to_respond (first_to_respond)
                        :primary_backup (primary_backup)
                        :load_sharing (load_sharing)
                        :client_decide (client_decide)
                )
                :default (dns_based)
        )
)
:automatic_mep_topology (
        :gateway (
                :map (
                        :false (false)
                        :true (true)
                        :client_decide (client_decide)
                )
                :default (false)
        )
)
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is documented here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk103440&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=Endpoint" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk103440&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=Endpoint&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 12:32:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Norbert_Bohusch</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-08T12:32:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>check point mobile site question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112655#M9071</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi - we are changing colocation facilities so the gateway that my RA users connect to is changing.&amp;nbsp; All of the sites on their client app were created by FQDN.&amp;nbsp; I have modified the DNS for that FQDN, my test users have flushed their dns cache, but yet they're still connecting to the old location.&amp;nbsp; when they ping the FQDN, it resolves to the new IP, but yet CPM is connecting to the legacy site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does CPM do something internally to tie the name to an IP?&amp;nbsp; If not, any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2021 20:30:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112655#M9071</guid>
      <dc:creator>D_TK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-07T20:30:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: check point mobile site question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112656#M9072</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We resolve the DNS name to an IP on first connection.&lt;BR /&gt;The site IP is what is written to the local client configuration.&lt;BR /&gt;The only way to change this currently is to delete and re-add the site.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2021 20:36:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112656#M9072</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-07T20:36:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: check point mobile site question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112657#M9073</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks D, that's unfortunate.....i have hundreds of these.&amp;nbsp; any way to automate by changing a reg key or the like?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2021 20:39:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112657#M9073</guid>
      <dc:creator>D_TK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-07T20:39:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: check point mobile site question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112659#M9074</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It’s not a registry key, it’s the trac.config file that would need to be replaced.&lt;BR /&gt;You’d also have to stop/start the relevant services in the process.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2021 20:43:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112659#M9074</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-07T20:43:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: check point mobile site question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112702#M9075</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It will not help in your case, as your clients already changed it to the IP which they resolved.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But to don't run into the same issue again, you can enable the following in "trac_client_1.ttm" on gateways with RemoteAccess:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;:enable_gw_resolving (
        :gateway (
                :default (true)
        )
)
:mep_mode (
        :gateway (
                :map (
                        :dns_based (dns_based)
                        :first_to_respond (first_to_respond)
                        :primary_backup (primary_backup)
                        :load_sharing (load_sharing)
                        :client_decide (client_decide)
                )
                :default (dns_based)
        )
)
:automatic_mep_topology (
        :gateway (
                :map (
                        :false (false)
                        :true (true)
                        :client_decide (client_decide)
                )
                :default (false)
        )
)
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is documented here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk103440&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=Endpoint" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk103440&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=Endpoint&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 12:32:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112702#M9075</guid>
      <dc:creator>Norbert_Bohusch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-08T12:32:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: check point mobile site question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112766#M9076</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately, that doesn't help if you are using MEP in first_to_respond mode as I am.&amp;nbsp; We have multiple VPN entry points around the globe and use FTR so that the users go to the most responsive one based on their local network connectivity.&amp;nbsp; We don't use multi-tunnel currently due to routing issues with a full-mesh MPLS backhaul network that makes that hard to configure and support.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;h&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 22:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112766#M9076</guid>
      <dc:creator>Heath_H</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-08T22:15:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: check point mobile site question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112797#M9077</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Shouldn't then, if you change the IP of one VPN endpoint, the client be able to connect to other endpoint and by that aquire new list of gateways?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 07:06:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112797#M9077</guid>
      <dc:creator>Norbert_Bohusch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-09T07:06:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: check point mobile site question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112849#M9078</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The docs really aren't that clear, but my understanding is that, if you use "dns_based", that you have to provide some form of DNS load balancing and direction outside of Check Point.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you are technically correct, that MEP will hand out all IPs to the client in the trac_client.ttm file.&amp;nbsp; But then you have to update the ttm file on all gateways to reflect the new IP address and install policy on each of them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to configure DNS resolution _and_ MEP?&amp;nbsp; And before anyone says that it's a security risk because "you can't trust DNS", isn't that the whole point behind the fingerprint verification that the client does?&amp;nbsp; The client doesn't trust the IP address either.&amp;nbsp; I already have DNS entries and public trusted certificates on my gateways for MAB.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 13:56:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/check-point-mobile-site-question/m-p/112849#M9078</guid>
      <dc:creator>Heath_H</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-09T13:56:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

