<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Remote Access VPN License in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Remote-Access-VPN-License/m-p/115311#M8902</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Maybe work with account services (license team) to confirm. CP licensing is very confusing, to be 100% honest about it...I heard that from many CP employees as well : )&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 17:55:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-05T17:55:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Remote Access VPN License</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Remote-Access-VPN-License/m-p/115278#M8900</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi CheckMates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do have an inquiry from my client regarding remote access vpn license. they have 2 Check Point Firewalls but only one have MAB license SSL-VPN-U due to budget limitation. Their use case is that when downtime occurs they want to transfer the MAB license to the other Firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this operation of constantly moving licenses from container to container advisable/recommended?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If not is there any SK related to the dettach/move/attach of licenses? if possible stating its not recommended&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What would be the effect and necessary changes need to make if they want to push it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 15:14:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Remote-Access-VPN-License/m-p/115278#M8900</guid>
      <dc:creator>Heisenberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-05T15:14:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Remote Access VPN License</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Remote-Access-VPN-License/m-p/115287#M8901</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Assuming the license is centrally managed, you can, in theory, re-attach the license to a different gateway from the management.&lt;BR /&gt;However, that can be disruptive and may not be possible of the gateway in question is offline.&lt;BR /&gt;What you’re probably better off doing in this case (assuming the downtime isn’t extended) would be to just apply eval licenses on the other gateway as needed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 15:42:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Remote-Access-VPN-License/m-p/115287#M8901</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-05T15:42:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Remote Access VPN License</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Remote-Access-VPN-License/m-p/115311#M8902</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Maybe work with account services (license team) to confirm. CP licensing is very confusing, to be 100% honest about it...I heard that from many CP employees as well : )&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 17:55:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Remote-Access-VPN-License/m-p/115311#M8902</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-05T17:55:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

