<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Link Selection Probing for Remote Access VPN - sk113617 in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Link-Selection-Probing-for-Remote-Access-VPN-sk113617/m-p/225326#M8119</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The referenced SK seems ... gone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does this mean that RAVPN client can now recognize that ISP_A is down and automatically attempts to connect to ISP_B? Is there some configuration needed to achieve this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 08:52:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven_Sultana</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-02T08:52:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Link Selection Probing for Remote Access VPN - sk113617</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Link-Selection-Probing-for-Remote-Access-VPN-sk113617/m-p/128172#M8114</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I really want to confirm something 100%. Above sk in the title, we understand and TAC told us this before that automatic failover with ISP redundancy is not supported with remote access VPN, but, to be absolutely sure, does this sk imply that isp redundancy is NOT supported with remote access vpn period, or just link selection part is not supported?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 20:52:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Link-Selection-Probing-for-Remote-Access-VPN-sk113617/m-p/128172#M8114</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-26T20:52:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Selection Probing for Remote Access VPN - sk113617</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Link-Selection-Probing-for-Remote-Access-VPN-sk113617/m-p/128305#M8115</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My understanding is that there is no mechanism on the Remote Access client to know that the gateway has failed over to the secondary ISP.&lt;BR /&gt;Which effectively means: Remote Access won't work when the gateway is failed over to the secondary ISP.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;There is an internal SK that talks about a not-recommended workaround to this which has some limitations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I suspect proper support for this would require an RFE.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2021 05:20:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Link-Selection-Probing-for-Remote-Access-VPN-sk113617/m-p/128305#M8115</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-30T05:20:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Selection Probing for Remote Access VPN - sk113617</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Link-Selection-Probing-for-Remote-Access-VPN-sk113617/m-p/128363#M8116</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks D...we actually do know that, but here is what I need to confirm. As I mentioned in my post, customer understands that automatic failover does not work and its not supported with isp redundancy for RA, BUT, does sk imply that isp edundancy is not supported with RA period, OR just the link selection part is not supported?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thats actually what I wanted to confirm.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:34:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Link-Selection-Probing-for-Remote-Access-VPN-sk113617/m-p/128363#M8116</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-30T14:34:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Selection Probing for Remote Access VPN - sk113617</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Link-Selection-Probing-for-Remote-Access-VPN-sk113617/m-p/128367#M8117</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The way I interpret it, absent a clear SK to the contrary, is just the Link Selection part that's not supported.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2021 15:04:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Link-Selection-Probing-for-Remote-Access-VPN-sk113617/m-p/128367#M8117</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-30T15:04:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Selection Probing for Remote Access VPN - sk113617</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Link-Selection-Probing-for-Remote-Access-VPN-sk113617/m-p/128368#M8118</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks as always D, appreciated! Thats exactly how I understood it as well...cheers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2021 15:06:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Link-Selection-Probing-for-Remote-Access-VPN-sk113617/m-p/128368#M8118</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-30T15:06:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Selection Probing for Remote Access VPN - sk113617</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Link-Selection-Probing-for-Remote-Access-VPN-sk113617/m-p/225326#M8119</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The referenced SK seems ... gone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does this mean that RAVPN client can now recognize that ISP_A is down and automatically attempts to connect to ISP_B? Is there some configuration needed to achieve this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 08:52:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Link-Selection-Probing-for-Remote-Access-VPN-sk113617/m-p/225326#M8119</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_Sultana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-02T08:52:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Selection Probing for Remote Access VPN - sk113617</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Link-Selection-Probing-for-Remote-Access-VPN-sk113617/m-p/225457#M8120</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This might help (with a DDNS setup): &lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk103440" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk103440&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 12:51:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Link-Selection-Probing-for-Remote-Access-VPN-sk113617/m-p/225457#M8120</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-03T12:51:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

