<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IPSec with two external Interfaces in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/IPSec-with-two-external-Interfaces/m-p/135140#M7600</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are planning to migrate our VPN-Users to another external interface on the Gateway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;eth1: 1.1.1.1&lt;BR /&gt;Currently used for Site-to-Site VPN and SSL-VPN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;eth2: 2.2.2.2&lt;BR /&gt;Planned Migration from SSL-VPN to IPSec VPN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IPSec is at the moment configured like this (Screenshot taken from SmartConsole Demo): LinkSelection.jpg&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If we change "Selected address from topology table: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX" all&amp;nbsp;Site-to-Site VPNs will drop (of course it will)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my consideration now is to change to "Calculate IP based on network topology" and "Reply from the same interface".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is CheckPoint able to handle&amp;nbsp;Site-to-Site VPN on eth1 and Client-VPN on eth2 with this configuration?&lt;BR /&gt;What are your thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;morris&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:59:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>morris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-11-29T09:59:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPSec with two external Interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/IPSec-with-two-external-Interfaces/m-p/135140#M7600</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are planning to migrate our VPN-Users to another external interface on the Gateway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;eth1: 1.1.1.1&lt;BR /&gt;Currently used for Site-to-Site VPN and SSL-VPN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;eth2: 2.2.2.2&lt;BR /&gt;Planned Migration from SSL-VPN to IPSec VPN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IPSec is at the moment configured like this (Screenshot taken from SmartConsole Demo): LinkSelection.jpg&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If we change "Selected address from topology table: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX" all&amp;nbsp;Site-to-Site VPNs will drop (of course it will)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my consideration now is to change to "Calculate IP based on network topology" and "Reply from the same interface".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is CheckPoint able to handle&amp;nbsp;Site-to-Site VPN on eth1 and Client-VPN on eth2 with this configuration?&lt;BR /&gt;What are your thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;morris&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:59:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/IPSec-with-two-external-Interfaces/m-p/135140#M7600</guid>
      <dc:creator>morris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-29T09:59:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPSec with two external Interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/IPSec-with-two-external-Interfaces/m-p/135363#M7601</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I seem to recall a thread on this where this did not work as expected for Remote Access.&lt;BR /&gt;More precisely, reply traffic went through the primary ISP even though the traffic was received on the second ISP.&lt;BR /&gt;Don't know if that will be the case for you or not.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2021 02:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/IPSec-with-two-external-Interfaces/m-p/135363#M7601</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-02T02:46:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPSec with two external Interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/IPSec-with-two-external-Interfaces/m-p/135383#M7602</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/9500"&gt;@morris&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;following&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?action=portlets.SearchResultMainAction&amp;amp;eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk92383" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Remote Access clients can connect to VPN Gateway only once&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;or&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk32229" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Configuring VPN Link Selection for Remote Access client&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;you can change the link selection behaviour for remote access clients.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;setting&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"apply_resolving_mechansm_to_SR" =&amp;gt; "false"&lt;BR /&gt;"ip_resolution_mechanism" =&amp;gt; "singleIpVpn"&lt;BR /&gt;"single_VPN_IP_RA" =&amp;gt; "2.2.2.2"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;changes your remote access destination for all clients to 2.2.2.2 on the gateway.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2021 08:42:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/IPSec-with-two-external-Interfaces/m-p/135383#M7602</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-02T08:42:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

