<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cloudguard Connect vs Azure vWAN in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Cloudguard-Connect-vs-Azure-vWAN/m-p/97375#M67</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey - currently you can use the Azure VWAN integration &lt;STRONG&gt;OR&lt;/STRONG&gt; add site objects regularly.&amp;nbsp; So once you start adding site objects, you cannot go back and mix it with your Azure automatic integration. Via a support ticket, Check Point can revert the things so that you can POC the VWAN integration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for your second option I believe you meant the CloudGuard IaaS - a virtual gateway that you deploy at your Azure regional hub by yourself. That would be the customer-owning-the-gateway-platform solution. With CloudGuard Connect, the security is delivered as a service and you don't need to handle the Check Point platforms. So 2 different approaches fitting different and very valid use cases.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:28:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tomer_Sole</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-23T17:28:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cloudguard Connect vs Azure vWAN</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Cloudguard-Connect-vs-Azure-vWAN/m-p/97373#M66</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just started the eval on the cloudguuard connect, and set up some connections. I did notice that in the start I could choose Azure vWAN integration, but that option disapeared after I created regular links..&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I tried deleting them all, to get the azure vwan option back - but it is gone now &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt; ... Anyone have any idea on how I get that option back ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And also, has anyone tried setting up cloudguard connect with azure vwan ? Any tips n tricks there - at least related to the script for the management... it looks a bit iffy, and only supporting r80.10 ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:05:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Cloudguard-Connect-vs-Azure-vWAN/m-p/97373#M66</guid>
      <dc:creator>vinceneil666</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-23T17:05:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cloudguard Connect vs Azure vWAN</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Cloudguard-Connect-vs-Azure-vWAN/m-p/97375#M67</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey - currently you can use the Azure VWAN integration &lt;STRONG&gt;OR&lt;/STRONG&gt; add site objects regularly.&amp;nbsp; So once you start adding site objects, you cannot go back and mix it with your Azure automatic integration. Via a support ticket, Check Point can revert the things so that you can POC the VWAN integration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for your second option I believe you meant the CloudGuard IaaS - a virtual gateway that you deploy at your Azure regional hub by yourself. That would be the customer-owning-the-gateway-platform solution. With CloudGuard Connect, the security is delivered as a service and you don't need to handle the Check Point platforms. So 2 different approaches fitting different and very valid use cases.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:28:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Cloudguard-Connect-vs-Azure-vWAN/m-p/97375#M67</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tomer_Sole</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-23T17:28:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

