<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Maestro VSX and SSLVPN in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Maestro-VSX-and-SSLVPN/m-p/150059#M6671</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Mates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So basically I just want to point something (and&amp;nbsp; maybe someone can explain what happened).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a VSX setup for a SSL portal and a bunch of users using SNX. Sometimes (it took me and tac 2 weeks to find why) SNX failed with 201 authentication error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Long story short, after some very good engineers (all my respect for them) joined a live session they've figured out that in VSX the default table space for&amp;nbsp; http_vpnd_cookies is 400! which was way to low for the number of users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The &lt;STRONG&gt;max_concurrent_vpn_tunnels &lt;/STRONG&gt;value in guiDBEdit is 200&amp;nbsp; which on a normal gateway is 12500.&amp;nbsp; (they are somehow x2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My question is&amp;nbsp; how come a humble gateway comes with 25000 and a VS with 400. How come, by default , a VS is capped at 15000 session when a SGM can support millions.&amp;nbsp; Is there any ration for that ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically I had 2 weeks of daily full outages, an angry client and a penalty fee for not being able to do this implementation on-time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 20:27:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>melkool</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-06-02T20:27:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maestro VSX and SSLVPN</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Maestro-VSX-and-SSLVPN/m-p/150059#M6671</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Mates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So basically I just want to point something (and&amp;nbsp; maybe someone can explain what happened).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a VSX setup for a SSL portal and a bunch of users using SNX. Sometimes (it took me and tac 2 weeks to find why) SNX failed with 201 authentication error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Long story short, after some very good engineers (all my respect for them) joined a live session they've figured out that in VSX the default table space for&amp;nbsp; http_vpnd_cookies is 400! which was way to low for the number of users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The &lt;STRONG&gt;max_concurrent_vpn_tunnels &lt;/STRONG&gt;value in guiDBEdit is 200&amp;nbsp; which on a normal gateway is 12500.&amp;nbsp; (they are somehow x2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My question is&amp;nbsp; how come a humble gateway comes with 25000 and a VS with 400. How come, by default , a VS is capped at 15000 session when a SGM can support millions.&amp;nbsp; Is there any ration for that ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically I had 2 weeks of daily full outages, an angry client and a penalty fee for not being able to do this implementation on-time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 20:27:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Maestro-VSX-and-SSLVPN/m-p/150059#M6671</guid>
      <dc:creator>melkool</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-02T20:27:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

