<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Clarification in regards to sk163313 in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Clarification-in-regards-to-sk163313/m-p/151736#M6548</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks as always!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:24:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-06-24T18:24:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Clarification in regards to sk163313</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Clarification-in-regards-to-sk163313/m-p/151734#M6546</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Happy weekend! Hope someone can clarify for me in regards to above sk...so say customer enabled IPV6 ONLY on their mgmt server, would their RA VPN be affected? I ask, because its too important for it to break and its listed as one of limitations. MY logical guess its only applicable when ipv6 is enabled on gateways, but want to be 100% sure, thats all.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tx as always!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 16:05:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Clarification-in-regards-to-sk163313/m-p/151734#M6546</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-24T16:05:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clarification in regards to sk163313</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Clarification-in-regards-to-sk163313/m-p/151735#M6547</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Should be no impact.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:22:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Clarification-in-regards-to-sk163313/m-p/151735#M6547</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-24T18:22:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clarification in regards to sk163313</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Clarification-in-regards-to-sk163313/m-p/151736#M6548</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks as always!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:24:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Clarification-in-regards-to-sk163313/m-p/151736#M6548</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-24T18:24:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

