<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Nest groups for Split Tunnel in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Nest-groups-for-Split-Tunnel/m-p/152150#M6524</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Generally, nested groups are supported.&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure in this context.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 21:29:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-06-30T21:29:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Nest groups for Split Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Nest-groups-for-Split-Tunnel/m-p/152127#M6523</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a split tunnel set for our VPN Remote Access users that excludes Microsoft traffic using an exclusion group and an update script to dynamically update Microsoft IP ranges.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We would like to add another non-Microsoft service to the split tunnel exclusion, but we can't manually add the IP's in to the current exclusion group as it will break it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does Check Point support nesting groups?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are thinking of creating another exclusion group and then nest both groups into a "master" split tunnel group for example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;Current config&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Remote Access Community &amp;gt; VPN Exclusion group &amp;gt; Group of MS IP list&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;New config&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Remote Access Community &amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; Split-Tunnel standard group&amp;nbsp; &amp;gt; VPN Exclusion group &amp;gt; Group of MS IP list&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;gt; Other exclusion group &amp;gt; Group of Other Service IP list&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:18:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Nest-groups-for-Split-Tunnel/m-p/152127#M6523</guid>
      <dc:creator>ascoyne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-30T13:18:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nest groups for Split Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Nest-groups-for-Split-Tunnel/m-p/152150#M6524</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Generally, nested groups are supported.&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure in this context.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 21:29:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Nest-groups-for-Split-Tunnel/m-p/152150#M6524</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-30T21:29:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

