<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Machine certificate authentication and VSX in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Machine-certificate-authentication-and-VSX/m-p/186566#M4716</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey, you tagged the post as Site to Site VPN, but it is in fact for Remote Access VPN, correct?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 08:35:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-07-17T08:35:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Machine certificate authentication and VSX</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Machine-certificate-authentication-and-VSX/m-p/186565#M4715</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure if I hit the bug or I'm doing something wrong -- any advise would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;VSX R80.40 Take 154 with two VSs -- b&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;oth offer VPN connectivity for EndPoint clients (using internal Check Point username/password).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I started working on machine certificate authentication on the second VS, and after setting Machine Certificate Authentication to Mandatory (under gateway &amp;gt; VPN Clients &amp;gt; Authentication) clients connecting to the first VS (without&amp;nbsp;Machine Certificate Authentication selected at all) got affected too.&amp;nbsp; The tunnel can be established, but no traffic passing through.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;After changing it to When Available, the issue is back to normal.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:08:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Machine-certificate-authentication-and-VSX/m-p/186565#M4715</guid>
      <dc:creator>Teddy_Brewski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-17T09:08:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Machine certificate authentication and VSX</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Machine-certificate-authentication-and-VSX/m-p/186566#M4716</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey, you tagged the post as Site to Site VPN, but it is in fact for Remote Access VPN, correct?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 08:35:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Machine-certificate-authentication-and-VSX/m-p/186566#M4716</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-17T08:35:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Machine certificate authentication and VSX</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Machine-certificate-authentication-and-VSX/m-p/186759#M4717</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As far as I know, this should be supported on VSX.&lt;BR /&gt;Recommend a TAC case: &lt;A href="https://help.checkpoint.com" target="_blank"&gt;https://help.checkpoint.com&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 20:22:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Machine-certificate-authentication-and-VSX/m-p/186759#M4717</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-18T20:22:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

