<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Legacy MAB Policy Enforcement Order in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Legacy-MAB-Policy-Enforcement-Order/m-p/209777#M3924</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/85630"&gt;@JH_Ranger&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;you should don't mix rules for MAB in the unified policy or legacy policy, use only one of them.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is it necessary to replicate all rules from the Legacy MAB into the Access policy as well? Yes it is, move all rules from legacy to unified.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-left" image-alt="2024-03-27 06_57_09.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/25038i7D1F2B1FB9996D08/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="2024-03-27 06_57_09.png" alt="2024-03-27 06_57_09.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The behavior how it works with unified policy can be found in the documentation&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.20/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.20_MobileAccess_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-MABG/Mobile-Access-and-Unified-Access-Policy.htm?TocPath=Mobile%20Access%20Authorization%20and%20Access%20Control%7CMobile%20Access%20and%20the%20Unified%20Access%20Policy%7C_____0#Mobile_Access_and_the_Unified_Access_Policy" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Mobile Access and the Unified Access Policy (checkpoint.com)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 06:03:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-27T06:03:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Legacy MAB Policy Enforcement Order</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Legacy-MAB-Policy-Enforcement-Order/m-p/209770#M3923</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi CheckMates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am curious about the policy enforcement order of the Legacy MAB policy. I understand that with the Unified Policy, it's possible to create Inline/Ordered layers and implement the MAB into that. But when is the Legacy MAB policy enforced? Before or after the Access rules?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I noticed that some MAB rules (in the SmartDashboard) allow a SNX user to a certain resource, but since there isn't a corresponding rule in the Access Rulebase (FW Blade) the traffic is dropped. The logs show a similar story, an "Accept" of the packet hitting the MAB blade, immediately followed by a default drop by the FW blade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it necessary to replicate all rules from the Legacy MAB into the Access policy as well?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R81.10 Take130.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 03:47:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Legacy-MAB-Policy-Enforcement-Order/m-p/209770#M3923</guid>
      <dc:creator>JH_Ranger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-27T03:47:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Legacy MAB Policy Enforcement Order</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Legacy-MAB-Policy-Enforcement-Order/m-p/209777#M3924</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/85630"&gt;@JH_Ranger&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;you should don't mix rules for MAB in the unified policy or legacy policy, use only one of them.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is it necessary to replicate all rules from the Legacy MAB into the Access policy as well? Yes it is, move all rules from legacy to unified.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-left" image-alt="2024-03-27 06_57_09.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/25038i7D1F2B1FB9996D08/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="2024-03-27 06_57_09.png" alt="2024-03-27 06_57_09.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The behavior how it works with unified policy can be found in the documentation&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.20/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.20_MobileAccess_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-MABG/Mobile-Access-and-Unified-Access-Policy.htm?TocPath=Mobile%20Access%20Authorization%20and%20Access%20Control%7CMobile%20Access%20and%20the%20Unified%20Access%20Policy%7C_____0#Mobile_Access_and_the_Unified_Access_Policy" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Mobile Access and the Unified Access Policy (checkpoint.com)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 06:03:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Legacy-MAB-Policy-Enforcement-Order/m-p/209777#M3924</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-27T06:03:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

