<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Differences between Endpoint Protection Advanced Remote Access VPN vs Mobile Access Blade VPN in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Differences-between-Endpoint-Protection-Advanced-Remote-Access/m-p/282733#M14641</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;The customer is currently using Endpoint Protection Advanced and, following headquarters' direction, plans to migrate to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for endpoint protection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The existing environment includes Check Point 9000 Series Security Gateway. As Microsoft Defender for Endpoint cannot coexist with the current endpoint protection solution on the same device, I am considering proposing the Mobile Access Blade license on the Security Gateway to replace the existing endpoint solution's remote access VPN (IPsec) functionality.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on the Check Point article (&lt;A class="" href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk67820" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Check Point SK67820&lt;/A&gt;), it appears that Check Point Mobile for Windows IPsec VPN connectivity requires both the IPsec VPN and Mobile Access Software Blades to be enabled on the Security Gateway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would appreciate clarification on the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is Check Point Mobile for Windows the same as Endpoint Security VPN?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is a separate IPsec VPN license required for the Security Gateway, or is it included as part of the existing gateway licensing?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 04:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>xxxrcearx</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-09-24T04:04:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Differences between Endpoint Protection Advanced Remote Access VPN vs Mobile Access Blade VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Differences-between-Endpoint-Protection-Advanced-Remote-Access/m-p/282733#M14641</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;The customer is currently using Endpoint Protection Advanced and, following headquarters' direction, plans to migrate to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for endpoint protection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The existing environment includes Check Point 9000 Series Security Gateway. As Microsoft Defender for Endpoint cannot coexist with the current endpoint protection solution on the same device, I am considering proposing the Mobile Access Blade license on the Security Gateway to replace the existing endpoint solution's remote access VPN (IPsec) functionality.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on the Check Point article (&lt;A class="" href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk67820" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Check Point SK67820&lt;/A&gt;), it appears that Check Point Mobile for Windows IPsec VPN connectivity requires both the IPsec VPN and Mobile Access Software Blades to be enabled on the Security Gateway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would appreciate clarification on the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is Check Point Mobile for Windows the same as Endpoint Security VPN?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is a separate IPsec VPN license required for the Security Gateway, or is it included as part of the existing gateway licensing?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 04:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Differences-between-Endpoint-Protection-Advanced-Remote-Access/m-p/282733#M14641</guid>
      <dc:creator>xxxrcearx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-24T04:04:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Differences between Endpoint Protection Advanced Remote Access VPN vs Mobile Access Blade VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Differences-between-Endpoint-Protection-Advanced-Remote-Access/m-p/282751#M14644</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;First - Licensing:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IPsec VPN is included in the FW license, so there is no additional license needed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;For the remote access, you either need the Mobile Access (MOB) license on each gateway with a corresponding concurrent user amount. Or you order the Endpoint Access Control license (CPEP-ACCESS) for the amount of users independent of the number of gateways.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Second - Client:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To use just the Remote Access, there is the Enpoint Security VPN client, that can be installed in 3 ways:&lt;BR /&gt;1. Endpoint Security VPN (correponds to the CPEP-ACCESS license)&lt;BR /&gt;2. Check Point Mobile (corresponds to the Mobile Access license)&lt;BR /&gt;3. SecuRemote (no license needed, but also no OfficeMode feature - so ignore this option)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 09:06:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Differences-between-Endpoint-Protection-Advanced-Remote-Access/m-p/282751#M14644</guid>
      <dc:creator>ThomasH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-24T09:06:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

