<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Mobile Access Blade Unified - Migrate in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Mobile-Access-Blade-Unified-Migrate/m-p/7450#M14278</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok, just an update, about the Legacy Mobile Access Policy Warning message that appears at push policy, it seems like this is some kind os visual bug.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I opened a Service Request and and they actually have a fix developed to top JHF_T42 on the management server only, that should fix this warning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nothing else needs to be done on my side, so configuration is good and MAB is now using Unified MAB Policy after all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Native Applications seem to be the only legacy apps, will do more testing in due time, hopefully.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 12:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MrSaintz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-03T12:01:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mobile Access Blade Unified - Migrate</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Mobile-Access-Blade-Unified-Migrate/m-p/7448#M14276</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to migrate MAB Policy to a recently upgraded R80.10 GW running Mobile Access Blade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First think I noticed, previous applications created to be used in legacy MAB are also legacy objects, and as far as I've been able to see if they are used in the "unified" rule-base they are not going to match. at least native application haven't.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I had to think like a regular remote access rule base configuration (that was actually good by the way, no more address-range objects IMHO).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What confuses me though, are the web based applications, Active Sync, etc, I luckily didn't have to migrate, since the customer was using anything like this, but it makes me wonder, since I have a lot of others, that are planning to update, and are using such applications in old MAB config so I'm having hard time figuring this out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Are all previous Mobile Application objects legacy type? If not which ones are legacy, and which are not, any available list?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. While migrating the policy, at push policy, one immediately notices, pre-Unified configuration warning detected, although I appreciate the heads-up on that, I actually left the configuration there, since one needs to make sure all settings were properly migrated, for a smooth move, but this message somehow is saying, unless I remove the shared mobile configuration, shared mobile will take over, this was my understanding, it may be wrong, and it looks that way since when I started this move native applications access stopped matching shared Mobile rules, as I stated in the beginning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone using this already, with it's full included features?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thought's appreciated,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Carlos Santos&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 15:12:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Mobile-Access-Blade-Unified-Migrate/m-p/7448#M14276</guid>
      <dc:creator>MrSaintz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-12T15:12:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobile Access Blade Unified - Migrate</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Mobile-Access-Blade-Unified-Migrate/m-p/7449#M14277</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Moving this to the &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/community/infinity-general/remote-access?sr=search&amp;amp;searchId=100e13b0-e7f4-47ad-ace6-a548ffd116c7&amp;amp;searchIndex=0" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/community/infinity-general/remote-access?sr=search&amp;amp;searchId=100e13b0-e7f4-47ad-ace6-a548ffd116c7&amp;amp;searchIndex=0&lt;/A&gt;‌ space.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:58:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Mobile-Access-Blade-Unified-Migrate/m-p/7449#M14277</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-21T08:58:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mobile Access Blade Unified - Migrate</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Mobile-Access-Blade-Unified-Migrate/m-p/7450#M14278</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok, just an update, about the Legacy Mobile Access Policy Warning message that appears at push policy, it seems like this is some kind os visual bug.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I opened a Service Request and and they actually have a fix developed to top JHF_T42 on the management server only, that should fix this warning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nothing else needs to be done on my side, so configuration is good and MAB is now using Unified MAB Policy after all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Native Applications seem to be the only legacy apps, will do more testing in due time, hopefully.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 12:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Mobile-Access-Blade-Unified-Migrate/m-p/7450#M14278</guid>
      <dc:creator>MrSaintz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-03T12:01:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

