<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VSX - Remote access on multiple VS in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VSX-Remote-access-on-multiple-VS/m-p/35713#M13124</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our customer has the exact same issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TAC told us to look at&amp;nbsp;sk75221 and change a MEP parameter. Does not make sense if you ask me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Indeed looks like a limitation...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 13:30:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Philip_W</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-23T13:30:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VSX - Remote access on multiple VS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VSX-Remote-access-on-multiple-VS/m-p/35710#M13121</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK so a customer is having this scenario:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;due to a merger, we have configured one new virtual firewall (vfw-xyz) that will also be used for the sub-company’s suppliers to connect via SSL Network Extender.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We configured SNX on this new firewall (vfw-xyz) and added it to the Remote Access community (so now the OLD vpn firewall (vfw-abc) and the new firewall (vfw-xyz) are part of the 1 default Remote Access community). A few days later we noticed that remote access on the OLD firewall (vfw-abc) stopped working. We removed the new one (vfw-xyz) from this community and now remote access works on BOTH gateways.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So here our questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Is this behavior expected? In other words: can only 1 GW be used in the Remote access community?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) How come remote access now works on the 2 GWs even though only one of them is a member of the Remote Access community?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We thought of editing the MEP file, but it was confirmed by TAC that on VSX, there is only one that is shared by all systems. It's a specific case I never encountered before, I wondered iof the community had experience in this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:41:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VSX-Remote-access-on-multiple-VS/m-p/35710#M13121</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex-</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-16T08:41:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX - Remote access on multiple VS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VSX-Remote-access-on-multiple-VS/m-p/35711#M13122</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pretty sure you can put multiple VSes (or gateways) in the default RemoteAccess community.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said, it seems odd that it "works" with a VS that isn't in the RemoteAccess community.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TAC should probably be engaged to troubleshoot this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2018 00:41:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VSX-Remote-access-on-multiple-VS/m-p/35711#M13122</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-20T00:41:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX - Remote access on multiple VS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VSX-Remote-access-on-multiple-VS/m-p/35712#M13123</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Dameon,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply. I come here after contacting TAC, which suggests it's a VSX limitation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can only have one MEP definition file shared between all VS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:13:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VSX-Remote-access-on-multiple-VS/m-p/35712#M13123</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex-</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-23T12:13:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX - Remote access on multiple VS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VSX-Remote-access-on-multiple-VS/m-p/35713#M13124</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our customer has the exact same issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TAC told us to look at&amp;nbsp;sk75221 and change a MEP parameter. Does not make sense if you ask me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Indeed looks like a limitation...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 13:30:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VSX-Remote-access-on-multiple-VS/m-p/35713#M13124</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip_W</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-23T13:30:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

