<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VPN routes issue in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VPN-routes-issue/m-p/8817#M13083</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Usually, Encryption Domain contains all internal networks behind the GW. Following the CP VPN Admin Guides for configuration, i have never encountered the issue you describe at all...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:08:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-24T08:08:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VPN routes issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VPN-routes-issue/m-p/8816#M13082</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When connected to VPN ( secureclient, office mode), i'm not able to get to internal sites ( RFC private networks) when split tunneling is disabled. So, i added RFC networks to encryption domains and ended up having 300+ routes in client machine. Is there better way to make it possible ? Also why are the routes added in below fashion instead of just one /8 or /12 or /18&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;----&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.255.240.2 10.255.240.1 1&lt;BR /&gt; 10.1.0.0 255.255.252.0 10.255.240.2 10.255.240.1 1&lt;BR /&gt; 10.1.4.0 255.255.255.252 10.255.240.2 10.255.240.1 1&lt;BR /&gt; 10.1.4.4 255.255.255.255 10.255.240.2 10.255.240.1 1&lt;BR /&gt; 10.1.4.5 255.255.255.255 10.255.240.2 10.255.240.1 1&lt;BR /&gt; 10.1.4.6 255.255.255.254 10.255.240.2 10.255.240.1 1&lt;BR /&gt; 10.1.4.8 255.255.255.248 10.255.240.2 10.255.240.1 1&lt;BR /&gt; 10.1.4.16 255.255.255.240 10.255.240.2 10.255.240.1 1&lt;BR /&gt; 10.1.4.32 255.255.255.224 10.255.240.2 10.255.240.1 1&lt;BR /&gt; 10.1.4.64 255.255.255.192 10.255.240.2 10.255.240.1 1&lt;BR /&gt; 10.1.4.128 255.255.255.128 10.255.240.2 10.255.240.1 1&lt;BR /&gt; 10.1.5.0 255.255.255.0 10.255.240.2 10.255.240.1 1&lt;BR /&gt; 10.1.6.0 255.255.254.0 10.255.240.2 10.255.240.1 1&lt;BR /&gt; 10.1.8.0 255.255.248.0 10.255.240.2 10.255.240.1 1&lt;BR /&gt; 10.1.16.0 255.255.240.0 10.255.240.2 10.255.240.1 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 05:08:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VPN-routes-issue/m-p/8816#M13082</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeril_Cherian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-24T05:08:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN routes issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VPN-routes-issue/m-p/8817#M13083</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Usually, Encryption Domain contains all internal networks behind the GW. Following the CP VPN Admin Guides for configuration, i have never encountered the issue you describe at all...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:08:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VPN-routes-issue/m-p/8817#M13083</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-24T08:08:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN routes issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VPN-routes-issue/m-p/8818#M13084</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea why routes are added those ways ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:03:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VPN-routes-issue/m-p/8818#M13084</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeril_Cherian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-24T09:03:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN routes issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VPN-routes-issue/m-p/8819#M13085</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe the reason is the way you defined / added it ? Usually, all networks defined as internal are in the Encryption Domain for the site when you choose for VPN Domain to use the Topology information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 11:03:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/VPN-routes-issue/m-p/8819#M13085</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-24T11:03:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

