<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Client-to-Site Firewalls also vulnerable to CVE-2019-8456? in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Client-to-Site-Firewalls-also-vulnerable-to-CVE-2019-8456/m-p/50188#M12387</link>
    <description>No.&lt;BR /&gt;Here's our official SK on the matter: &lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk149892" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk149892&lt;/A&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 19:10:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-08T19:10:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Client-to-Site Firewalls also vulnerable to CVE-2019-8456?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Client-to-Site-Firewalls-also-vulnerable-to-CVE-2019-8456/m-p/50165#M12386</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We don't use the firewalls to terminate Site-to-site VPN, but Client-to-Site VPN connections. Are those gateways also vulnerable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Roger&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 15:06:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Client-to-Site-Firewalls-also-vulnerable-to-CVE-2019-8456/m-p/50165#M12386</guid>
      <dc:creator>Doeschi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-08T15:06:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Client-to-Site Firewalls also vulnerable to CVE-2019-8456?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Client-to-Site-Firewalls-also-vulnerable-to-CVE-2019-8456/m-p/50188#M12387</link>
      <description>No.&lt;BR /&gt;Here's our official SK on the matter: &lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk149892" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk149892&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 19:10:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Client-to-Site-Firewalls-also-vulnerable-to-CVE-2019-8456/m-p/50188#M12387</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-08T19:10:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Client-to-Site Firewalls also vulnerable to CVE-2019-8456?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Client-to-Site-Firewalls-also-vulnerable-to-CVE-2019-8456/m-p/50251#M12388</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Dameon,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for the answer, I've been reading this SK, but the "Description" is very briefly and since the CVE is still closed that's all information we have. So I rather ask than guess, if also Client-to-Site VPN Gateways are affected as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Roger&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 08:44:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Client-to-Site-Firewalls-also-vulnerable-to-CVE-2019-8456/m-p/50251#M12388</guid>
      <dc:creator>Doeschi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-09T08:44:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Client-to-Site Firewalls also vulnerable to CVE-2019-8456?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Client-to-Site-Firewalls-also-vulnerable-to-CVE-2019-8456/m-p/50333#M12389</link>
      <description>Quite alright to ask.&lt;BR /&gt;If Client-to-Site VPN configurations were affected, they would have been explicitly mentioned in the SK.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 17:20:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Client-to-Site-Firewalls-also-vulnerable-to-CVE-2019-8456/m-p/50333#M12389</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-09T17:20:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

